BiblicalMastery Buddy's bible blog

April 17, 2020

Defining Moments- Exodus

Filed under: Defining Moments — admin @ 4:55 PM

From the time of Joseph to the beginning of the story of Moses there was a lapse of over 300 years. The preparation for the Exodus to follow eighty years later begins in chapter one where we are told that Amram and Jochebed decided to hide Moses from a likely death at the hands of Pharaoh’s men. That act was in a direct violation of Pharaoh’s edict to have all male Hebrew babies killed at birth.

(Ex. 1; Acts 7:20; Heb. 11:23)

God used two women to assure the continuation of the nation of Israel. For Shiphrah and Puah, Hebrew midwives it was more important for them to fear God and obey Him than it was to follow the dictates of the king of Egypt. God had already commanded the Israelites not to take a human life. Those two women understood to kill the babies was a sin against God. Because of their faithfulness God blessed each one of them. (Ex.1:17, 20-21)

When we come to the life of Moses and the role he would play in the history of Israel, there are three events or periods of time that should be considered defining moments for him. He could not have orchestrated them, but God used each of them to shape the man he became. The ones I reference in what follows are prior to his confrontation with Pharaoh. That discussion will come later. What I am talking about here begins with his murder of the Egyptian and ends with the encounter he had with God in the desert. The last of the three would have never taken place without the first two. The first shows us God uses even our failures to grow us

The path Moses took to becoming the leader of the Israelites is an important part of his life and must never forgotten. A defining moment came when he tried to develop a relationship with his people. What began in his mind as a good idea actually ended in disaster. On one of his visits he saw and Egyptian mistreating an Israelites. In his eagerness to help the man he killed the Egyptian. Of course, that kind of act cannot be hidden from others. When he tried to break up an argument between two Jews one of them confronted him with the what he had done the day before. Moses had assumed that they would understand that because of his position he would be able to help them.

(Ex. 2:11-14)

Because he killed an Egyptian, even though he was the adopted son of Pharaoh’s daughter, he would not be exempt from being punished by the Pharaoh for his crime. This was especially true since he was a Hebrew. The victim was a citizen of Egypt. At that point Moses had no choice but to flee for his life.

(Ex. 2:15)

His flight into Midian turned out to the benefit of Moses. Although he had to leave Egypt for all the wrong reasons, what happened to him over the next forty years would prepare him for leading the Israelites out of Egypt. In ways that Moses could not understand God was working out the future of His people in precise detail.  It was no accident, but God’s ordained plan, that he would meet the daughters of Jethro, a priest in Midian. From his father-in-law, he would come understand the role that humility in one’s life and the skills that would be needed if he was going to accepted as a servant leader by his people. Gone were the self-confidence and arrogance that had led him to using brute force to prove what an important man he was. He would find the way back to Egypt in front of a flock of sheep. Here was a one-time prince of Egypt doing one the lowest dirtiest jobs that could be performed in society. Shepherds were looked down upon as unclean people in culture. One of the things that would be discovered is that it took a great deal of patience to take care of a bunch of dumb animals that have a mind of their own.

(Ex. 2:15-4:19)

Although a shepherd may be held in contempt by others it was to such men to whom the announcement came that a Savior had been born into the world. The lowly shepherds of Bethlehem became the first to proclaim the Good News to others. In fact, the most famous ancestor of our Lord began as a shepherd boy before becoming a king. One of the titles often used in the New Testament spoke of that king. Jesus was called the Son of David by Bartimaeus and even used the description for Himself.

(Matt. 20:29-34, 22:41-45; Luke 2:8-20)

In was while performing his duties as a shepherd that the encounter with God took place. That meeting would forever change the direction of his life. He would go from being a shepherd to the man God called to lead the people out of Egypt. Even here we see a process taking place that was needed to remove from Moses the mindset of a failure to one with God’s help could accomplish great things. Part of the defining moment was the honest dialog that Moses had with God.

It is not always an easy thing to move a person from acceptance of the status quo to one of a totally new direction of being willing to take risks. The former is always going to be comfortable while accomplishing little. The latter brings with it all kinds of exciting possibilities. For Moses fear of going back to the place from which he had fled was in a way paralyzing. To go where God was going to send him would take real faith, but in the meantime would free him from his past.

It might appear from what has been written that the defining moments just pop up out of no- where. Just the opposite is true. I discovered that quite often there is a process that occurs that brings a person to the fork in the road where decisions really do affect one’s destiny. In the case of Moses, we must not forget there, would have been no trip to the back side of the wilderness or burning bush without all of the challenges He face in the forty years preceding that moment when God met him.

In all of our lives where are today is dependent on all the steps we have taken along the way. Most of us do not even take the take to consider how even what appear to be baby steps have impacted who we are. Many of you may not be familiar with a tool called a “Spiritual ProfiIe” originally developed by Rick Warren, pastor of Saddleback Church in California.  It is used in conjunction with discovering a person’s SHAPE, which is an acrostic for Spiritual Gifts, Heart, Abilities, Personality, and how Experiences good or bad play a part in one’s spiritual growth. One of the exercises the participant is asked to do related to experiences is to go back to his/her earliest years and write down all the things that can be remembered. Those recollections are to be of those things in which he or she believes were done well. Taking those experiences, I would like to suggest another way of looking at them. Let’s view them from the perspective of what they would look like them if viewed as encounters with God.  It is those encounters we have through His word, prayer, events, or associations with others that truly shape us to be what God desires for each of us,  

Moses did not find the encounter easy because quite often the expression comes with personal risks.  We have already mentioned that Moses to do what God asked his to do might end with rejection by his people to death at the hands of Pharaoh. We truly need to be prepared for the consequences of following him with full confidence that He will be with us every step of the way.

Let’s take a journey back to that encounter with God. How did Moses react?  If you have gone through the exercise mentioned above, did you see God’s hand in what has happened in your life? What was your reaction and response to His calling? See if you can picture yourself in some of the arguments that Moses offered by to God.  You might even come up with some variations of the same struggle he had with venturing into the future.

As we shall see in one of Moses’ most important moments, his encounter with God at the burning bush there was a certain process in play. I view it with four words beginning the letter E.

They are:

  1. Equipping- This is the preparation that takes place in one’s life. They are the lessons learned from different venues, whether education, spiritual life, family etc.
  2. Encounter- This points to the actual meeting that takes place with God.
  3. Expectations-What impact the time has on each of us in understanding His purpose for each of us.
  4. Expression- Once God lays before us the expectation, He has for carrying out His ministry, are we going to follow through with the plan He has for us?

Equip
To be equipped or prepared for the encounter or experience with God, what criteria is to be used to judge equipping?

1.  What has been your preparation for worship God this week?
a. Bible reading
b. Prayer
c. Or has it been to put the family in the car and show up at the front door wearing your church face.

2.  Even though it may appear that the experience is spontaneous God never springs it on someone who He has not prepared for that special time.  We may see it as unexpected but there are years of growing, suffering, learning etc. behind that encounter.

For example Moses, like David, had many hours to reflect on all of the events surrounding his life as he shepherded the sheep during those forty years in the desert..  How could he forget the way in which he was saved by the courage and wisdom of his mother from certain death after his birth as was the fate of so many of the Hebrew boys by order of Pharaoh.  Then to have Pharaoh’s daughter find him and for his own mother to nurture him during the formative years had to make a great impact on his life.  She possibly was his nurse and caregiver for the first seven or eight years of his life.  His thoughts could have turned to the training he received in the courts of the palace only to have to flee because of the murder he committed.  Now after 40 years in the desert as a shepherd of his father-in-law’s sheep he was more ready to do God’s bidding than he could comprehend.
     

Another way of looking at the way we have been prepared to meet God is a different acrostic. It pretty much presents the same criteria as was seen above in discovering one’s SHAPE.  Wayne Codeiro in his book, “Doing Church as a Team,” shares that each of us has a specific spiritual identity that uniquely equips us for our relationship with God and His Church.
He calls it DESIGN.


Again, each letter refers to the way God has wired us for His purpose. They are:

  1. Desire.  Are passions, drives and motivations
  2. Experience.  Unique experiences that specially equip us to serve God
  3. Spiritual Gifts.  There are at least 16 service gifts listed in the Scriptures.  Each follower of Christ has a least one
  4. Individual Style.  Personality
  5. Growth Phase.  The path you have taken in becoming a mature follower.
  6. Natural Abilities.  Examples would be math skills, writing, athletic etc.  God-given talents.

Once the preparation has been made then there is the experience itself and the lessons God wants us to learn.

From Moses’ burning bush experience there are certain things that can be discovered.
It is all about God
1. It is God’s agenda.  It is He who sets the conditions.  Moses was told to take off his shoes. 
2. God made the spot where Moses was standing holy.  Can you imagine that a sandy, hot, desolate place could be declared holy?
3. It is God who speaks.  He spoke out of the burning bush
4. It is He who gives the instructions, the directions the challenges.  I am going to send you to Egypt.
5. He does not have to listen to us any more than He would accept the sacrifices of the Israelites when their hearts were not committed to Him.  Most of our responses are but weak excuses when we are in His presence.  Moses said I cannot go because I do not speak well.
6. He determines the place and the time. Moses surely would have walked over that same ground many, many times before, in his 40 years in the desert.  In all that time he had never seen a burning bush before.  When the cries of the Israelites reached their peak, God said it is time.

When God approaches us as we come into His presence, we discover worship is not about us it is all about Him.  

Do we really think that this was a comfortable situation for Moses?
1. He was told to take his shoes off.  Out there in the burning desert in the heat of the day God says remove your shoes. 
2. Would it not be disconcerting to realize that the God of the universe was actually talking with you?
 

Expectations.
God has a plan and purpose and part of the experience must always be to try and discern what that purpose entails.  This is the hardest part to understand about experiencing God.  He never allows the person to leave that time unchanged.  He truly wants a transformation to occur in each person’s life.  Because this may all be new to us, He never expects anything but baby steps at first.  For those who have been in His service for a while He calls for greater commitment

Moses was going to be no different.  He was going to leave that time spent alone with God with a tremendous responsibility for the nation of Israel.  He was going to be God’s leader for that time and the next forty years.  Moses did not believe himself to be equipped to face the uncertain future.  God however did not allow Moses to escape his responsibilities with a false sense of humility and inadequacy.  God held his feet to the fire.

Expression.
God has spoken since time began that to experience Him will always result in service or sacrifice.  There is a cost
In Ephesians 2: 8-10 we are told. “For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works, so that no one may boast, for we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works.

Paul in Romans 12:1-2 says, “Therefore, I urge you, brethren, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies a living and holy sacrifice, acceptable to God, which is your spiritual service of worship.  And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what the will of God is, that which is good and acceptable and perfect.

In Phil 3: 10 he writes, “that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection and the fellowship of His suffering, being conformed to His death; In order that I may attain to the resurrection from the dead.”

Wayne Codeiro writes, “that God is worthy of our very best.”  He goes on to say, “Because everything we do is for an audience of One, everything matters!” (Page 83)

Moses responded by going to Egypt. This service did not come without pain and suffering.  He had to deal with the same kinds of attitudes and situations we face.

So how do we equip ourselves for this experience?
The first prerequisite is to come into that personal relationship with God through His Son Jesus Christ.  Then and only then will you experience that true encounter.
Learn your SHAPE/DESIGN
Listen to God through His word
Come before Him with an attitude of service.  Someone has written that there is no such thing as a non-serving Christian.

(Ex. 3:1-4:19)

There is one more incident that occurred before Moses arrived in Egypt that must not be overlooked. It took place on the trip back. Remember Moses had been in Midian for forty years. During that time to sons were born to him Being a Jew he was to follow the covenant given to Abraham. All male children who were descendants of Abraham were to be circumcised. Whether Moses forgot or did not believe it necessary to do so since he was living in a foreign land we shall never know. One thing for sure God had not forgotten the covenant and it was important to Him. His people, especially Moses who was to lead a whole nation out of Egypt, was to be obedient to God’s commands. How could he be the leader of his people if he was disobedient to God. Luke wrote something that applied to this situation. Jesus said, “From everyone who has been much, much will be required; and to whom they entrusted much, of him they will ask all the more.” (Luke 12:48) It was his responsibility and his alone to circumcise his sons not his wife’s. What almost took place could have changed what God had planned.  As a consequence of his disobedience, God was about to kill him. If it had not been for quick action of Zipporah, Moses would have died never carrying out the purpose of God for His people. Her rebuke of him was necessary. She called him “a bridegroom of blood.

(Ex. 4:24-26)

Although he had been warned by God that Pharaoh would not allow the people go except under duress, Moses was called off guard by his reaction. God had to intervene to keep Moses and Aaron from giving up the cause even before God begun to deal with the king and the Egyptians. How easy it is to quit when the going gets rough. The old saying that says, “When the going gets tough the tough get going.” This certainly was going to true for Moses, so it was good that he learned that lesson well early in the process.

(Ex. 3:19-20; Ex. 5:1-2)

The moment everything changed in Pharaoh’s life did occur when he commanded the Egyptians to enslave and oppress the Israelites. (Ex. 1:10) It also did not happen when he gave the order to have all of the male babies killed. (Ex. 1:16,22) When, however, he said to Moses, “Who is the Lord that I should obey His voice to let Israel go? I do not know the Lord, and I will not let Israel go,” began his downfall. With that one statement he set in motion the devastation of his nation and loss of his own firstborn son. He reached, by his actions, the point of no return. We are told in Scripture that God hardened his heart. I believe what really took place was God’s confirmation of the condition of Pharaoh’s heart that already existed.

(Ex. 5:2; 10:7; 12:29)

Each plague that took place in Egypt which were judgments against all of the gods of the Egyptian people accomplished two things. First in help to increase Moses’ faith in God’s ability to carry out His plan. It also demonstrated God’s power over false gods that the people in the land worshipped.

(Ex. 7:1-10:29)

Although all of the previous plaques did not get the desired results for the Jews, the final one would break the will and spirit of the people. Because of his stubbornness Pharaoh would see all of the first born of Egypt die on the night of the Passover. Egypt would never be the same again but would always be a second-rate nation.

(Ex. 12:29-30)

The Passover was to be a day of national identity for the Israelites. It was a sign of salvation from the oppression of the Egyptians and the beginning of their journey to the Promised Land.

(Ex. 12:2, 11-14, 17,27,42, 51: Heb. 11:28)

Pharaoh’s continued stubbornness had cost him everything. Now as a last act of defiance toward God he sent his entire army to total destruction in the Red Sea.

(Ex. 14:2-31)

Aaron listened to the voices of the people and gave into their demands for a god to lead them back to Egypt.  He rather than proving he was a leader of men. If was obvious that even if Moses did not return, he was not capable leading the people forward into the Promised Land. He lacked the important attributes of courage, commitment to the goal or understanding of who God was. Instead his place would be as a follower not a leader.

There was another man Saul who listened to the demands of the people and lost a kingdom. (1 Sam.) Aaron certainly proved here that he could not be trusted with the responsibility given him. Never again he would have such an opportunity and always live in Moses’ shadow.

(Ex. 32:1-5: Acts 7:39-41)

As a result of worshipping the golden calf three thousand of the Israelites were killed by the sword at the hands of the Levites. Many more had their names removed from the Book of Life.

(Ex. 32:27-28, 32-33)

It took the sin of the people to bring Moses to the point of understanding his purpose in what God was doing with the Nation of Israel. His identity was now bound up in the future of his people in a way that he had not allowed himself to be before this test. The first indication that a shift in his thoughts had taken place was his willingness to have his name removed from the Book of Life if God did not forgive His people. We see this same commitment in Romans 9:3 where Paul was willing to give up his own salvation for his brethren and kinsmen among the Jews.

Secondly, He was unwilling to leave Mt. Sinai without the leadership and presence of God. Moses understood that he could not lead the people unless the Lord was with him. When a person reaches a moment of ultimate commitment there comes with it a different mindset. Moses desired

  1. To find favor with God
  2. To know His ways
  3. To truly know Him. The first two will never occur without the intimate knowledge that each of us need so badly.
  4. To find favor in God’s sight
  5. To identify himself with God’s people.

 (Ex. 32:32; 33:13, 15-16; 34:9

Defining Moment- Genesis

Filed under: Defining Moments — admin @ 4:50 PM

In the first couple chapters God showed that He created man to be in the image of the trinity. One of the characteristics that is exclusively given to man by God is freewill, the ability to make choices.

Adam was given simple instructions about his responsibilities and what he was to accomplish in obedience to God. He was to:

  • Be a good steward of the creation over which he was given authority to rule. (Gen. 1:26, 28)
  • Be fruitful and multiply to continue mankind. (Gen. 1:28)
  • Eat vegetation given to him. (Gen. 1:29)
  • Not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. This command issued by God, demanded obedience from Adam and Eve. To disobey would bring death to them and the possibility the end of mankind itself. (Gen. 2:17)

To be all of what God meant man in total obedience to be is a true definition of one who is created in God’s image. God provided Adam with the opportunity that no man has experienced. He was to be in perfect harmony with His creation and relationship with Him.  As we shall see in chapter 3 and probably preceding the description of God walking in the garden in the cool of the evening, that special time with the Lord had surely been going on from the time man was first created. There was nothing to spoil the perfect world of Eden as long as man was in perfect communion with the Father.

All of that was about to change as man asserted his free will. From the events seen in chapter 3 it appears that having a perfect world was not enough for man. The man and woman were easy targets for the wiles of the devil.

Eve was about to commit acts that would radically redefine the course of history and showed her open rebellion to God’s authority. The apostle John summed up what we shall see in his letter to the church at Ephesus. He wrote about the trap the world offers into which Adam and Eve were caught. He said, “For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the boastful pride of life, is not from the Father, but is from the world”. Of the things man believes are so important are temporary at best for he wrote, “The world is passing away, and also its lusts.” 1 John 2:16-17

Falling for the serpent’s sales pitch she turned her attention once more to the tree of the knowledge of good and evil with a new level of interest. At the time of her decision Eve did three things that clearly showed a heart attitude of rebellion against God’s authority. She:

  • Determined the fruit was good for food.
  • Liked its physical appearance.
  • Believed it would be the source of wisdom.
  • Actually, Eve ate of the fruit and then gave some to Adam to eat. By doing so she involved him in her conspiracy against God.

Sadly, with the eating of the fruit she received the very thing she desired because the eyes of both of them were opened.  But with all of man’s rebellion against God the results are never what God had determined was the best for them. (Gen. 3:6-7

The only difference between what Eve did and Adam’s sin is she allowed herself to be deceived while he voluntarily took the fruit from her hand and ate it. They now had the knowledge of good and evil. As a consequence of that one act on the part of both of them every generation since that time has been cursed with a sin nature. (Gen. 3:6)

Things did not turn out as expected. Instead of becoming like God they were soon to discover that God did not relinquish His throne and authority. Instead of being:

  • Wise they became ashamed of their nakedness and were afraid to face God.
  • In God’s earthly paradise called the Garden of Eden they found themselves outside with no way to return.
  • God’s steward of His created world Adam would now have to toil to harvest food by waging a continuous battle against the thorns and weeds that the land would now produce.
  • A god Eve found herself under the authority of Adam, who now himself was a sinful individual.
  • Joyful for the progeny that would be born through her the ordeal would be one filled with pain, but even with the pain she would still desire relationship with her husband. (Gen. 3:16-19)

It is interesting that God pronounced His judgments on the serpent before laying out the future for Adam and Eve and all of those would follow after them. For his part in the devil did not get the outcome he hoped for out of the incident.  Knowing that Jesus was going to come in the future, I believe he either hoped to dominate the couple or that God would destroy man because of sin and Christ would never be born. God stated three things to the serpent. He would:

  • Be the eternal enemy of man
  • Move around on its belly
  • Eventually meet with complete defeat at the hands of the Savior of the world.

       (Gen. 3:14-16)

It is a commentary on the condition man that after the fall there is no reference in the Bible of God speaking communing with the two of them again. Man had broken the relationship.  Nothing He would say could repair the damage caused by their rebellion. Man would have to wait thousands of years before redemption came in the form of the God/Man, the second Adam.  From that point own the Scripture is full of the failures of man to be reconciled with the Father.

In the story of Cain and Abel is seen the sin of man after the fall being played out for all to see. At some point both men seemed to acknowledge the reality of God.

Each person who is saved comes to Christ in a unique way. The common factor is the realization that he or she is in need of a Savior. To acknowledge that fact brings about the defining moment of beginning a life in Christ. What is different for each person is the way he comes to that decision.  Many can tell the exact moment when he became a Christian. To others the understanding of the need for Christ comes over a period of time and many experiences feed into the story. For every person salvation is in a way a mystery. How is it that the Almighty Creator of the whole universe has provided a way for each person who desires it to have a personal relationship with Him?  As we read through the Scripture, we are not always told the exact point in time when a person moves from being lost to gaining eternal life. The other mystery is that only God knows when the decision made is genuine and will lead one into eternity.

This is true of the two brothers, the first children of Adam and Eve.  The Bible tells us that the men knew God, at least knew of Him.  Surely their parents had told them all about what God had done in creating the world and their part of the story.  Each man reacted differently. Their sacrifices brought to Him reflected the view they had of God. The practice of worship would lead to the defining moment in the life of one of them. I say just one because by the time the story reaches its climax Abel would be dead. It is obvious that Abel had a deeper relationship with the Father than Cain.

Somehow, he understood it was not enough to just bring some of the harvest as Cain did by the best and the first of his possession to be presented as an acceptable sacrifice.

This may have become a pattern in Cain’s life to present to God enough to get by.  Finally, God came to him to settle accounts.  It reminds me of the number of times Jesus spoken of being faithful with what God has put into the hands of man to manage for Him. Cain had been remiss in honoring God with the sacrifices He deserved.

Rather than being repentant of his sin his response was to become angry and despondent. God provided Cain with a second chance. He first asked him a question. “Why are you angry? And why has your countenance fallen?” He then provided him with a solution to his sinful attitude. He said, “If you do well, will not your countenance be lifted up? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door and its desire is for you, but you must master it.” (Gen. 4:6-7) 

Here is the second recorded defining moment in the life of Cain. The first was the acknowledgement of God.  The second was the opportunity to repent and return to the Father who had given life and blessings.  At that moment Cain chose to rebel against God.  He took out his anger and frustration on his brother Abel and killed him. Because of anger and jealousy, we have the written account of the first murder in the world. (Gen. 4:8)

As usually happens people will lie to cover up their guilt. Cain could not however hide what he had done from God. God declared him guilty by stating that He knew what had taken place. The very thing that keeps a man alive, the blood that courses through his veins had been spilled out and Abel’s blood was seen in heaven as evidence of the crime committed. Cain’s life was spared because God had not yet established the law that said that a man was to be executed when he killed another human being.  In a way Cain’s sentence was fitting. He was cast out into the strange and unfamiliar world to roam and fear all of his life with no place to call a permanent home.

Sin is lurking at the door of every man’s life to destroy his relationship with the Father. Paul admonished the Romans to be careful with these words, “Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body so that you obey its lusts.” (Rom. 6:12) Cain did not heed the warnings he had received from God.  He chose to give into that sin. He allowed it to become his master.  After a defining moment is reached, any act that follows is just an extension of that decision. That moment was a turning point in Cain’s life from which there was no turning back. (Gen. 4:3, 5-7, 13-14; Rom. 6:12; Heb. 11:4-5)

One of Cain’s descendants, Lamech followed in his footsteps. In him was seen the same kind of rebellion against God in full bloom. In the killing of both man and boy he set himself as judge and jury in deciding to mete out the extreme punishment against the two of them. Gen. 4:23. Neither of the acts committed against him would justify murder on his part. Not only that, he set himself up as greater than his father, Cain. His statement to his two was a good indicator of the pride that filled his life. He said, “If Cain is avenged sevenfold, then Lamech seventy-fold.” (Gen. 4:24)

After that one glimpse into the life of Lamech and his evil actions, he is never mentioned in Scripture again. I think that this incident was inserted to show just how far a man would go in turning away from God. His defining moment made him an infamous character in the annals of time.

When Cain was banished to wander on the earth as a vagrant there was no one to preserve the line of Jesus. Adam and Eve however were determined to carry out the mandate of God to multiply and inhabit the earth. To them was born Seth. At the time of his birth Eve spoke the following words, “God has appointed me another offspring in place of Abel. For Cain killed him.” Through him the ancestry of Jesus continued and was not destroyed, as the devil may have desired. (Gen. 4:25) Notice he was to be listed in the descendants of Adam. Cain was excluded, although there were children born to him. 

After Seth, Enosh his son was born. More importantly it was the writer put it, “Then men began to call upon the name of the Lord.” (Gen. 4:26) Why am I including the tow verses 25-26 in material on defining moments? It seems to me that the Moses was trying to show his listeners that the world had come through a time of apostasy. Both Cain and Lamech had brought a new level of evil and rebellion into the world.  It was now time for men to turn back and begin to worship the Lord.  Probably the manifestation of this was a return to the presenting sacrifices. We first were exposed to them in the life of Abel and men were once again beginning to acknowledge the Lord in their lives.

It is interesting that the mention of man calling on the name of God occurred at the beginning of the genealogy of Adam following the birth of Enosh. We are told, first of all, “When God created man, He made him in the likeness of God.” (Gen. 5:1) Moses then goes on to said, “He created them male and female and He blessed them and named them Man in the day they were created.” (Gen. 5:2)

It is obvious that it was important because author spoke concerning man and woman and their relationship to Him and to each other more than once.  The normal God given relationship He set up from the very beginning was between man and woman. Through their union eventually the Savior of the world would come.

It would be in the life of Enoch, seven generations from Adam, that we see a man who in ways revealed to us came to know God in a personal way.  We shall see it again, but it is still a wonderful mystery to see the way God works in the lives of men. Enoch at some point had his defining moment. We are given a clue because from the time of the birth of his son Methuselah when he was sixty-five years old, he spent the rest of his three hundred sixty-five years walking with His Father. We have to ask ourselves what cause that one man to have such faith.  Although, it is an amazing fact that unlike any of us he had available combined wisdom of all of his ancestors dating back to Adam were still alive during his lifetime. We would think that the stories told by them would have influenced the spiritual life of each person to the extent that they would have been like Enoch. The question is how was Enoch different? What moved in his heart that completely changed his life in a way that made him unique among the early patriarchs?  It was obviously the Holy Spirit working is his heart that brought him into the personal relationship with God.  We to this day do not understand how out of a family or a group of people that one person will be attuned to the calling of Christ while those around him do not hear the call.

Not only was Enoch a true follower of God but also a prophet. In naming his son Methuselah he spoke a prophecy of the judgement on mankind that would take place because of the depravity of each man’s heart that was becoming rampant in the world. The fulfillment of those words would take place at the end of Methuselah’s life. The meaning of his name was “When he dies, it will come.” (Gen 5:22-24)

His reward for his faithfulness was to be translated into heaven without having to go through the pangs of death. We can now have that same experience because of what Christ did for each of us on the cross.

None of us know the impact our descendants will have on the world. Lamech, Enoch’s grandson and Methuselah’s son spoke words about his son that could have only been a hope. He seemed to be depending on the next generation to make the world a better place to live.  We hear this all the time when it is said, “what kind of world are we going to leave to our children?” Or “I hope they can straighten out the mess we have made of things.” To me it is a sad state of affairs when we try to live vicariously through our children and taking responsibility for the time we are given here on earth. Lamech said basically:

  • Give us rest so we do not have to work so hard.
  • It was God’s fault for making life so difficult in our labor. 
  • It was God’s, not man’s fault that the ground was cursed. 

(Gen. 5:28)

When a man recognizes the part, he plays in this fallen world, it is the beginning of working towards solutions. We can never accomplish anything by continually blaming others.  No one gets anywhere by constantly throwing pity parties. God wants us to confess our sins so that He can forgive us. Only then can anyone be used for the benefit of the human race.  We are not given the responsibility to fix the whole world, but we surely can try to make where we are a better place.  Misplaced as it was for Lamech, like him each person does have hope that his or descendants will add to the world and not be weight that drags it down.

God was preparing for the future. Noah could not know lay ahead.  We are told before the story unfolded for him, he had three sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth through whom the whole world would be repopulated.

By the time Noah had reached the age of five hundred the world had become an immoral and evil place. Sexual immorality had become prevalent with children being born who did know or want to have anything to do with God.  For the most part godless parents will produce godless children. It was at critical period in the history of Adam’s descendants that God determined to bring judgment on His creation.

In the midst of such a trying time there stood out one man who was different than all others. Not even Noah’s father or grandfather found favor with God as both lived well after God’s prophecy to destroy the world had been given. In fact, Methuselah lived up to the year of the great flood.

Once again, we see God working in a man’s heart in spite of the circumstances swirling about him. Noah is described as:

  • One who found favor with God
  • A righteous man
  • Blameless in his time
  • One who walked with God (Gen. 6:8-9)

Although Noah was a man after God’s own heart, he still had to face his hour of decision on his own. It had to be difficult for him to comprehend that God was going to bring judgment on the earth with a great flood when there had never been rain up until his day.  Then to be told to build a great boat because the rain was going to come at some point in time took a lot of faith.  True to his character the Scriptures tells us, “Thus Noah did according to all that God commanded him, so he did. (Gen. 6:22; Heb. 11:7)

It took a hundred years, but the floods came just as God had promised. Because Noah had been willing to be obedient from the first moment God came to him, he and his immediate family and the animals were saved from being destroyed along with every other living being on the face of the earth. (Gen. 7:23)

There turned out to be one dark spot in the story of Noah. The decisions of each of his three sons when their father became drunk and lay naked in his tent would affect the lives of each of them from that moment on until this day. Each of the son’s responded to Noah’s situation in a different way. In patriarchal society when the father was to be respected and held in high esteem Ham did just the opposite by sharing with his brothers their father’s condition. Both Shem and Japheth acted to protect Noah’s name. Each of them took a blanket, backed into the tent and covered their father without looking at him. We do not know how he knew that it was Ham who had shown such disrespect, but it is obvious from the prophecy he proclaimed that he did. While the two older brothers received a blessing the family of Ham through his son Canaan was cursed forever. The land the Israelites would eventually conquer was named after Noah’s grandson.

When the people began to spread out over the face of the earth a number of them came to the land of Shinar. There they decided to build a city and a tower to establish a name for themselves. The tower was an effort to show that man did not need God to succeed. They could build a building that would reach all the way to heaven. It would ultimately become the city of Babylon. God would not put up with such arrogance but so long. He came into the presence of the people involved and not only scattered them but changed their language so they could not understand one another any longer. 

The attitude of man is still the same as in the day of the Tower of Babel. He is continually attempting to make a place for himself without God. As He did with the people, who were rebelling against Him, God will intervene and bring about judgment.  One thing for sure God will not be ignored by any people and not suffer the consequences of that decision. (Gen. 11:4-9)

For each of us there, if we are honest with ourselves, is the realization that the relationship with God that is growing in our lives is not a straight line from conversion to a committed true disciple of Jesus Christ. There are fits and starts, hills and valleys, mistakes, right and wrong decisions. Sometimes we stay on the path toward godliness, but quite often we stray in many different directions. As we take a look at Abraham’s life there are many aspects that we can identify in ourselves that are reflected in his walk.

The life of Abram who would later be called Abraham is an interesting study in human nature.  He would be called a friend of God and a man of righteousness, but in his life, there were many decisions made that seem to be in conflict with those descriptions of him. Like us the development of his character was a slow process. It would take more than twenty-five years for his faith to become strong.  However, from the very first that we hear of him in Genesis God saw the potential end results of complete devotion for Him, He would obtain from Abraham. 

Even though it would be one of the important incidents occurring in his life that would be a defining moment for him, we have mistakenly thought it was Abram who decided to leave Ur of Chaldeans. In Actually, it was Terah, Abram’s father who led the expedition from his home country of Ur to Haran in present day Syria. His plan was to ultimately proceed into the land of Canaan. Terah, however died there in Syria.  Abraham thus became the patriarch of the family at that point in time. He probably would have settled down there in Haran if the Lord had not intervened. The earlier decision of his father did however position Abram and his family to follow through on Terah’s original plan to move into Canaan. (Gen. 11:31-32)

There were many events that would occur in Abraham’s life leading to a greater and greater relationship with the Father. Of course, none of the others would have taken place unless he had been obedient in to leaving all that was familiar and comfortable. God had plans had for him he could not even begin to comprehend. Until the death of Terah he had been under the authority of his father. He was now to make decisions that would affect the future of his family. Those choices would define him as a man of God.

The Bible never explains why Terah decided to leave Ur of the Chaldees in the first place. There could been many reasons, but there have been a couple of possibilities. It may have been the need for new grazing land for his flocks of sheep.  He may not have been very concern about the influence that the pagan culture was having on his family. We will see a weakness in Lot later on that might give credence to the latter idea. It is a mystery known only to God why such a drastic change would be brought about in the life of a family. We do not have an explanation from Scripture to let us in on God’s decision- making process. There only one way we know about the events that took place. It was while in Syria that Abram received instructions for the next phase of his life.

Having said that it would not be an unusual situation for a family to pick up and move from one place to another. Abram’s family was probably nomads as shall be seen by his travels throughout the rest of his life.

What would have been different was the method by which Abram was called to leave Haran.  The actual act of moving would not seem strange for a man who had an adventurous nature and was always looking for greener pastures. However, to be directed to go into a land completely unknown to him took courage and a certain degree of faith. This mindset may have played a part in his willingness to move.  From the very beginning of time individuals have been curious about what lay ahead around the next bend of the road. (Gen. 12:1-4; Acts 7:3-4; Heb. 11)

As was mentioned above, Abram who would become Abraham was a man of many contrasts. On the one hand we are told that Abram was declared righteous because of his faith. He then turned around and did things that spoke of a man who thought he was in control of his own future.

Thankfully, God did not turn His back on Abram but was with him both in Egypt and Gedar.

(Gen. 12:1-4; Acts 7:3-4; Heb. 11)

Fits and starts are terms that could be used to describe Abram’s process toward truly becoming the man of God through whom the covenant would be realized. Some of those experiences that would occur along the path toward God included:

  1. God’s command to Abraham was for him to leave everything and everyone behind before entering into the land God was going to give him. He disobeyed by taking his nephew, Lot with him. That decision would later on cause him problems when the conflict started because of their possessions. (Gen. 12:5)
  2. Abraham’s decision to go into Egypt. This act would lead to the conflict between Lot and him over the lack of grazing land available for of the livestock the two owned.

(Gen 12:10)

  • Abraham asked Sarah to pretend to be his sister in order to keep from being killed by the Egyptians. Here again is seen how weak Abraham’s faith was. God had already told him that he would be the founder of a great nation. If he had been truly listening, He would have realized that in order for that to happen God was going to protect him no matter where he went.  To not bring Abraham through difficult circumstances would mean that God was a big enough God to carry out the promises He had made. (Gen. 12:10-20)
  • Displaying a tentative faith. When God told him that he would be the father of a great nation and possess the land where he was living, he sought a sign to prove that what he was being told was true. (Gen. 15:6)
  • His decision to take matters in his own hands to have a family by having a child by his wife’s slave, Hagar. That one act has had a detrimental effect on history from that time on to this day. Ishmael would be the ancestor to the Arab world who are present day enemies of Israel, Abraham’s descendants. (Gen 16)
  • Once again using his old tactic to protective himself while in Gerar.  Abraham had not learned in lessons from his first trip into Egypt. Once again, He was willing to put Sarah and the future of the promised covenant in danger by asking her to pretend to be his sister. (Gen. 20:2-13)

Lot, the albatross around Abraham’s neck comes into the picture. He reminds me of the son who is still living in the basement of his parent’s home until he is thirty expecting them to take care of him in the same way they did when he was young. Even it was common in that culture for a number of generations to live together two things stand out about the relationship between Abraham and Lot. First, Lot was not Abraham’s responsibility because he was not his son but a nephew. Secondly, God had specifically commanded Abraham to leave all of his family behind in Haran before going into the land of Canaan.  It was time for Lot to separate from his uncle and begin a life on his own. Following the journey into Egypt there arose a conflict between the herdsmen of Abraham and those taking care of Lots livestock.  There was not enough grass for the combined livestock to feed. Abraham allowed Lot to choose any of the land for his new home. Abraham would then go in the opposite direction. Lot’s defining moment came when he decided to move toward Sodom and Gomorrah. Like so many choices made during a person’s lifetime his move looked like a good idea at first. He chose a land with plenty of water and as the Bible says, it was “like the garden of the Lord.” Although, initially he located his family close to the two evil cities he eventually moved into Sodom. (Gen. 13:10,12) 

It was Lot’s decision to move to Sodom which set in motion the events that would be devastating to his family. It brought about:

  1. Compromise with a pagan society
  2. The capture by pagan kings and rescue by Abraham. It appears by this time Lot had lost all that he possessed before moving away from Abraham.
  3. Death of his wife
  4. Acts of incest with his two daughters

(Gen. 14:11-16; 19:1-38; Luke 17:32)

As was mentioned earlier, one of his mistakes was having Absalom by Hagar at the insistence of Sarah.  His lack of faith of not waiting for God’s timing in having a descendant led to conflict in his family. Ultimately, after Isaac had grown into childhood things came to a head when Sarah commanded that Ishmael and his mother be sent away. Ishmael grew into a man who was at odds with those around him. The world is still experiencing the evil that came from Abraham taking the future in his own hands.  (Gen. 16: 1-12; 21:9-21)

The child of promise was born to Abraham and Sarah. God’s covenant to Abraham was beginning to come to fruition at the birth of Isaac. (Gen. 21:1-8)

It is an amazing thing that for all the experiences Abraham had in his over one hundred years it took his willingness to offer Isaac as a sacrifice to have God say to him what had never been part of their conversation before. God was about to test him in a way that had taken place in his life. To offer one’s only son would be ultimate sacrifice that a parent could make. Abraham was obedient in a way that not many people would be.  Of course, this was a picture of what God would do with His own Son. Jesus willingly laid down his life as a sacrifice for all of us. The moment that would decide to whom He owed everything was being willing to give up that one who was his only true hope for the posterity of his family and future of God’s chosen people. His name was Isaac.  At this decisive moment, Abraham heard God speak. He said, “I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me.”   

In that one moment Abraham’s life was turned from one of self-preservation to total commitment. He understood that God was the One truly in charge of his life and the events surrounding him. In faith was evident in the fact that he believed that God would provide the lamb for the sacrifice or somewhat raise Isaac from the dead.  Figuratively, he did receive his son back from the dead.

(Gen. 22:8,10-12,16-18: Heb. 11:17-19)

It was only after Abraham offered the substitute for Isaac did God speak to him and then made one of the greatest promises of all. He was told that He would be the ancestor of the Savior of the world. (Gen. 22:16-18)

Abraham had gotten old and there was no suitable candidate for a wife for Isaac to be found among the people of Canaan.  Therefore, Abraham sent his trusted servant to Syria to find a wife for Isaac from the family of Laban, his nephew.  We discover the next defining moment in the sequence of events leading up to the choice of Rebekah to be Isaac’s wife. We might find it amazing that she would decide to go with Abraham’s servant whom she had never met and travel to a foreign land to marry someone she did not know. Her willingness to leave her family would eventually lead to the birth of Jacob and Esau who would continue the lineage of Abraham which would lead to the birth of Christ.

(Gen 24:58)

The story shifts from Isaac to certain important events in their lives that would impact history from that point on. That is exactly what defining moments do in each person’s life, some on a much larger scale than others as we shall see in the lives of the grandsons of Abraham.

In a way the destiny of each of them was established before they were born. Rebekah was told by God what the future held for the two boys. The family of one would be stronger than the other. The promise that would turn decorum on its head was that the older would serve the younger son, thus given him first place over his brother. As the events unfolded in each of their lives it will be seen how decisions made by each of them would bring the prophecy to pass.

It was Esau who set the stage for Jacob to become the inheritor of the promises made to Abraham and thus become the more dominant brother. By his actions Esau disqualified himself from being used by God.

Esau married a Hittite woman from the descendants of Canaan, the son of Ham. As we read earlier Canaan had received the curse from Noah and would become servants of Shem. This marriage displeased Isaac and Rebekah and excluded him from being an ancestor of Jesus.

(Gen. 26:34-35)

The second major decision, to sell his birthright for a bowl of bean soup set the stage for the others that would affect his place in history down the road. It showed a man who was more concerned about his physical needs which brought immediate gratification without regard for the future consequences of his action.

(Gen. 25:29-33)

The final act that sealed his place in history was completely out of the hands of Esau. It was a request made by his father and a deception perpetrated by Jacob and Rebekah. That act of deception became the truly defining moment of her life. It came a great personal cost to her. The sequence of events that were all part of her desire to ensure the position of Jacob to receive the portion of Isaac’s estate which would have normally gone to the eldest son. Rebekah:

  1. Influenced Jacob to deceive his father.
  2. Although mentioned in the Bible probably lost the trust of her husband. After all was accomplished surely, he would have known that Jacob could not have accomplished the act alone.
  3. Angered Esau to the point that he considered murder of his brother. To retaliate for what was done to him, he took additional wives from pagan societies.
  4. Never saw Jacob again. If she did those times were never recorded in Scripture.

One has to wonder if later in life reflected on her actions. She had to ask herself was the consequences she experienced worth the deception that she has carried out against her husband.

(Gen. 27:5-41)

After Jacob had stolen the blessing intended for Esau, Esau came to the stark realization of what he had so flippantly given up for a bowl of bean soup.

(Gen. 27:36-38; Heb. 11:20)

What seemed like a good idea at the time would cost Jacob 20 years of his life as he had to flee from his brother and leave the home he had always known.  During those years with Laban his father-in-law he married two sisters and had 12 children in all. Benjamin was not yet born. He finally fled from Syria to return back to his father in Canaan.  As he travelled, he was confronted by none other than Jesus.

(Gen. 27:43-32:33)

While waiting to meet Esau, for the second time in his life Jacob found himself completely alone. The first time was he fled from his brother and found himself at Bethel. It was completely different from his current situation. The previous time he had nothing to lose because everything had belonged to his father. Even though he had the birthright and the blessing they were just empty possibilities because he did not know what the future held for him. His circumstances were now different. He had responsibilities for all he possessed. There was now a family, slaves and livestock of various kinds to be considered.  There was a possibility that he could lose all of it when he met his brother.

Only when he had faced his greatest challenge in life by wrestling with God’s messenger would he receive the name, “Israel”. Indeed, God gave him a new name which mean one who strives with God and man and succeeds. Although that event was to be defining moment for Jacob, the one thing it did not accomplish immediately was killing his old human nature. His old sin nature was still evident in his subsequent meeting with his brother.

(Gen. 32:14-30)

When thinking about Esau it is easy to write him off as one of the lesser characters in the Bible. This may be a natural tendency because we read in Malachi 1:2 and Romans 9:13 that God loved Jacob and hated Esau. If Esau was not important to God, why should we give him much attention. There are some practical concepts about forgiveness and overcoming circumstances that are seen in his life.  He held onto the promise from Isaac that he would eventually break the yoke of servitude from around his neck. (Gen. 27:40) So, let us step back a take another look at Esau’s life and what God can do in one person we might view as a second class.

It is evident as we shall see that sometime during the period of the twenty years since Jacob had left that God had been working in Esau’s life. No, he could not get the birthright or blessing back because they were no longer his.  The one thing he had the power to do was to forgive his brother. No longer did he hold onto the hatred he had for Jacob but had relinquished it long before he was to meet with his brother. As we see in the Scripture in a way the shoe was on the other foot so to speak. Jacob possibly because of guilt had a great fear of meeting his brother face to face again. Esau had forgiven Jacob and thus was a free man long before Jacob knew that he was free from the penalty of his sin.

Jesus brought forgiveness to each of us long before we knew that it was available to us. We walked around with the guilt resulting from our old sin nature until God met us where we were and said we were free and part of His family. Like, what Jesus did for all mankind, Esau was offering reconciliation between Jacob who did not deserve forgiveness and himself. Esau was making the offer even before Jacob knew it was available to him. The forgiveness of Esau was a foreshadowing of what was done for each of us through the death of Jesus on the cross. He brought two parties who were at enmity with each other brought them together in a new relationship.

One other point that needs to be made before moving on. It is clear that a new view of the relationship that might be available to him was important enough for Esau to go to Jacob. If he had still wanted to kill Jacob all he had to do was wait until he had gotten closer to home. He made the journey from his place of comfort to go to meet his brother not knowing what awaited him. Again, this has to remind us of Jesus who left His home in glory to become just like the man He came to save not knowing how He would be received.  His sacrifice offered every person the opportunity to have his own personal defining moment of be reconciled to God.

(Gen. 32:6)

What was taking place in Jacob’s heart was just the opposite. If there was to be any relationship with his brother reestablished it would be on his terms.  Everything he contrived was for, ultimately his own self-preservation.  This was obvious from the grand performance he put on to attempt to placate Esau. What is seen in his excuses his mistrust of his brother. One of the reasons given was so full of holes that it should have been plain to see by all what Jacob was doing. He had presented Esau with a gift from his herds and flocks to be taken back by Esau to his home.  When Esau suggested they travel together Jacob basically said that his animals were not up to the trip. Those presented as gift were from the same herds and flocks as the one’s Jacob claimed could not be pushed. To his credit and showing the kind of man he had become, Esau returned home with the gift and without Jacob and all that belonged to him. Esau had changed but at that point Jacob appears to be same man he was before the whole episode.

(Gen. 33:1-13)

Jacob still had many lessons to learn, but that was the beginning point of the changes that need to take occur in his life. There in Peniel he received the blessing and promise, not from man but from God. He believed that God had preserved him even though he had seen the very face of God and lived.

(32:24-30)

An incident involving Jacob’s daughter occurred because he did not follow through on his promise to continue his journey until he came to the place where Esau was living. Establishing a residence among the people of Shechem led to rape of Dinah and the subsequent death of all the men in Shechem.

Of course, not all of the responsibility need fall on Jacob’s shoulders. Shechem the son of Hamor was old enough to control is emotions and not rape Dinah.  The act, even though Shechem tried to play down the severity of his actions by offering to marry the girl. His offer did not placate the anger of her brothers leading to the destruction of a whole city.   

(Gen. 33:18-34:31)

Jacob was commanded to travel to Bethel and live there to reestablish the relationship he had. He wisely followed God’s command. His first time at Bethel had been when he was fleeing from Esau.  It was there that Jacob had been a rudimentary altar and promised that if he returned to the land that God would be his God and that he would tithe all that he had. (Gen. 35:1)

The decision to share his dreams with his brothers and then his father would forever alter the course of Joseph’s life. It started a sequence of events that would take him all the way to Egypt.

(Gen. 37:5-10)

Not only was it a defining moment in the lives of Joseph and his brothers but also a breaking point in a relationship that was fragile at best and was to get even worse.  Even though it might seem that the dreams Joseph were the cause of the hatred his brothers had for him, the roots went very deep in the dynamics of the family’s life.  They were only the tipping point that drove the brothers to take drastic measures against him. The decision to sell their brother would have a permanent effect on each of their lives from that point on. Every day they had to live with the consequences of their actions. I will cover some of the forces at work when I write specifically about Judah. Although he played a major role in what took place in this narrative, I would prefer to view the changes that God brought about in his life by the time he made the second trip down to Egypt.

(Gen. 37:26-35; 42:21-22)

Without going into a lot of detail before looking at the future events in Joseph’s experiences in Egypt there is one point to be made here which will emphasized again. Joseph’s time of testing and trials came about partly because of Jacob’s partiality towards him. He was his father’s favorite son and the affection he had for him was on display for everyone to see. We can see how this would breed jealousy in the hearts of his brothers.

(Gen. 37:3)

As mentioned, Joseph was his father’s favorite son. This led to an attitude of superiority towards his brothers. The beginning of his downfall came when he tattled to his father bringing “a bad report” about them to Jacob. (Gen. 37:2) Compounding the situation were the dreams that placed Joseph as ruler over the other brothers and then over the whole family including Jacob and Leah. (Gen 37:5-10)

From that point on they could not even speak to him because of their anger. Their opportunity came to get rid of the pest. Jacob sent him to find out how his brothers were doing while watching over the sheep. They all saw his appearance, first as an opportunity to kill him so they would longer have to put up with him. They changed their minds and decided to sell him to Midianite traders. They could not of course see by killing him would eventually put their own lives and those of their families in jeopardy. They were also short-sighted in not thinking how their actions would affect Jacob when they presented to him supposed evidence of Joseph’s death. (Gen. 37:18-35)

Before we return to Joseph this would be a good place to look at Judah’s part in the future of Jacob’s family. To do so we will not be covering the events in the rest of Genesis in chronological order. More important than the order we have an opportunity how the events in one’s life do become defining moments that change a man’s life.  God does truly is the One working behind the scenes moving a person in a particular direction.

Some of the things that occurred in Judah’s life were completely beyond his control. In a way God would take even the wrong decisions and use them for His purpose and glory. Let’s look at see how Judah got to the point of being God’s instrument.

  1. Judah was the fourth son born to Leah. His name actually means praise. Although Leah was Jacob’s first wife through deception, her husband actually loved Rachel, Joseph’s mother more than the other wives.
  2. Although we are not told this in the Bible we can be assured as Judah and the others got older, they would have been aware that their mother was not the first chose of Jacob.
  3. When Joseph came along, he became the favorite son leaving the others to get the scraps of his affection.
  4. Early on it was obvious the he rather than Reuben was going to be the leader among his brothers.
  5. Judah was the one who suggested that they should sell Joseph rather than kill him.
  6. For some reason Judah decided to move away from the rest of the family. During that time, he married Shua a Canaanite woman by whom he had three sons. His wife died and two of his sons died because as the Bible said God took their lives because they were evil leaving Tamar the wife of both them as a widow.
  7. After the death of his two sons Judah had sexual relations with Tamar.  It would appear that Tamar would go to any lengths to preserve the name of her husband, even to pretending to be a harlot. Under the practice of the Levirate tradition she should have become the wife of Shelah. When she saw that was not going to happen, she took matters into her own hands. Her actions were not without risks. There was good possibility that she could have been executed because she committed fornication. From her union with Judah two additional sons were born. One of them whose name was Perez would become an ancestor of Jesus.
  8. Years later when a famine had come upon the known world the sons of Jacob made two trips to Egypt to buy food. During that first trip Joseph, who his brothers did not recognized demanded that they would not be allowed to buy anymore food unless the returned with their younger brother. Jacob delayed sending the men back to purchase more food even when offered his own two sons be sacrificed if he did not return with Benjamin.  Even with such a promise he was afraid something might happen to Benjamin, Joseph’s younger brother.
  9. We begin to see the what God had been doing in Judah’s heart. The one who was callous in selling his brother now promised his father that he would protect the boy. Although the decision to sell Joseph was ruled by a mob mentality, Judah would now be faced with his own defining moment. He could not begin to understand what it meant when he said to his father, “I myself will be a surety for him; you may hold me responsible for him (Benjamin). If I do not bring him back to you and set him before you, then let me bear the blame before you forever.” Jacob saw before him in Judah one who had changed and could now be trusted with Benjamin’s safety. Notice that Jacob now relied on Judah as a man of his word and not Reuben, the oldest son. The indiscretion of Reuben with Bilhah had diminished his standing in his Father’s eyes. Judah along with all of his brothers, including Benjamin, set out on their second and what would be a very eventful journey. We shall see in the next chapter whether the changes in Judah were real. Would he be a man of his word when faced with a challenged he had never experienced before. (Gen 43:9)
  10. When Benjamin was accused of stealing Joseph’s cup, Judah stepped forward and offered himself as a replacement to take his younger brother’s punishment. He lived up to the promise he had made to his father. (Gen. 44:15-34) Unlike Benjamin who was falsely accused we are guilty of sin deserving death, but Jesus stepped before His Father and offered Himself as our substitute.
  11. In his plea to Joseph there is a picture of a mature man who had outgrown his jealousies, had forgiven his father for the neglect that he and his brothers had experienced and had come to have a deep love for Jacob.  The last thing that he would want to see happen was for Jacob again go through the deep time of grief when he thought Joseph had been killed. (Gen. 44:15-34)

For Judah to reach the level of maturity he showed in the things that took place in Egypt, at some point made the life changing decision to become a servant of God. He could not have shown such a willingness to sacrifice himself without the love of God living within him.

We have all made mistakes for which we are truly sorry and are thankful for God’s forgiveness. Like Judah we are to grow from those experiences and have a desire to be a stronger and wiser disciple of Christ.

Jacob in his last blessing to his sons, clearly identified the characteristics that were operative in their lives and what it portended for each of their families in the future. What they were was going to affect what the future held for each of them. In a way it was a defining moment for each of them based on past decisions and actions. Let us take a looked at how Jacob viewed each of his sons. I will focus on five of them. Those brothers would play a significant role in the future of Israel. Although all twelve would become the patriarchs of the tribes not much was written of them in the Scriptures.

  1. Reuben- Although he was the oldest lost the blessing to Joseph and the leadership role to Judah because of his uncontrolled behavior having slept with one of Jacob’s wives. He would not be preeminent
  2. Simeon- Had a violent nature. Both he and his cohort in crime were men full of anger and self-will. His family would not have an inheritance they could call their own but be dispersed in the midst of the land given to the tribe of Judah.
  3. Levi- Because of his alliance with Simeon he would not have an inheritance but would be scattered throughout the land that would be given to Israel. This prophecy became true as the Levi’s descendants through Aaron would become the priests and located in cities given to them throughout Israel.
  4. Judah- One who was praised by his brothers. Although, Joseph received the blessing. The kingly line came through him.  Eventually he would be the ancestor of the Messiah. 
  5.  We cannot leave Genesis without looking into the life of Joseph and seeing how the events in his life shaped the kind of man he became. God still uses men like Joseph in every aspect of the world today. Many will have and are suffering in much the same ways as Joseph did. We will begin at the same place of his interaction with Judah. It is interesting how their lives were connected at the beginning and the end of the narrative found in Genesis. As with Judah there were events in his life that were completely out of Joseph’s hands but were critical in shaping the kind of man he became.

 Like Joseph no man may know when those events might occur that bring about major     changes the direction of his or her life.  There may be a decision that you have been thinking about but putting off because of circumstances   Your thoughts may be on a job change, getting married, making a move to a new location, or mending some fences with someone.  It could be the ultimate decision of becoming a follower of Jesus Christ.

There is not a single one of us who have not made choices that have impacted our lives for good or bad, success or failure.  I don’t know if any of you are familiar with what I would call a decision tree used in witnessing tools like Continuing Witness Training (CWT) or Evangelism Explosion (EE).  It is also used in certain sales training.  It goes something like this.  For every yes or no answer there is a certain path you take until you get to the next yes or no answer.  This continues until either, a sale is made, or someone accepts Christ, or you can see that any further conversation is useless.

History is full of examples of those who came to that turning point when they went down a path that led them to being part of our world.  I think of those men who have brought about great destruction and oppression like

Stalin

Hitler

Marx

Lenin

At the opposite end of the spectrum we find

Billy Graham

Charles Colson

And many others we could name.

Even churches arrive at a defining moment, when the decisions made could possibly affect how it is to minister in particular community, whether it will grow and be healthy or become another statistic.

Of course, in each of our lives there are some things over which we have no control.  Things like our relatives

Where we live in our early lives

Even what we wear

And what we are made to eat

For a while we are pretty much at the mercy of what others see as beneficial for us.

Later as we grow, the decisions we make have greater consequences than whether we eat green peas and oatmeal.  These are what I call critical moments or turning points.  Even those which we do not think as important may impact our health and happiness.

 I would like for us to look at the life of Joseph who ultimately would hold the future of the nation in his hands. 

Let us start with some of the things that were decided for him.

  1. His family.  Father, Jacob; Mother, Rachel, one brother and nine half-brothers and one half-sister
  2. His father’s relationship with him and his brothers. (Gen. 37: 3)
  3. The hatred and jealousy his brothers had towards him because of the bad report he gave his father concerning them. (Gen. 37:2

      4.   The fact he was his father’s favorite. (Gen. 37:3)

  •  His dreams (Gen. 37:5-10)
  • Action taken by his brothers against Joseph.

  a.    Threw him in a well.

  b.    Planned to him

  c.    Sold him to Ishmaelites (Gen 37:26-28

  • Became a slave in Potiphar’s household. (Gen. 39: 1-6)
  • Thrown into prison wrongly charged by Potiphar’s wife. (Gen 39:20)

With the decision to sell Joseph, his life would be altered in way of which he would have never dreamed could happen to him.  No longer would he be in the protective environment under the watchful loving care of Jacob.  He was thrusted into the strange and new world of Egyptian culture.  It would be a place totally unlike anything he had ever experienced.

Before we look at the rest of the story it is critical for us to understand that it is not always the situation in which we find ourselves that is the measure of the maturity of a person but how we react to what is happening to us.  Joseph from the very beginning had two options. He could have become bitter and uncooperative.  He chose the better path of working as to the Lord and not to man. (Eph 4) This turned out to his benefit because the Lord blessed him in every place in which he found himself.

During his sojourn in Potiphar’s household there came the critical moment when he would make a decision that would change everything for him.  We read about it in Gen. 39: 7-12.  These verses show the real test of Joseph’s faith and character.  It would have been so easy to have started a relationship with Potiphar’s wife which in the short term may have been beneficial to his success.  Sooner or later Potiphar probably would have discovered their little secret and Joseph would have been executed.  By staying true to God

in the face of such a great temptation he may have landed him in jail for a while, but God was still working out His purpose for the Israelites through Joseph.  As it is said about Moses in the book of Hebrews “by faith Moses when he had grown up, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter, choosing rather to endure ill treatment with the people of God than to enjoy the passing pleasures of sin, considering the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures of Egypt.” (Hebrews 11:24-26) That statement could have also been attributed to Joseph.

It seems such an injustice for a person of Joseph’s high moral character to be put into prison.  As strange as it may appear, this too was all in God’s plan for him and God’s chosen people.  We need to take note here that the jail where Joseph was incarcerated was where Pharaoh’s prisoners were detained. (Gen 39:19-20)

His decision to stay true to God resulted in Joseph being put in charge of all the others in the part of the jail where he stayed.  Here was the one jailed being given the keys to the vault.  Eventually in his position he came into contact with Pharaoh’s cupbearer and baker.  (Gen. 40:1-4)

 Joseph combines the best of the choleric and melancholy types of personalities.  On the choleric side he displays the drive and passion to face the difficulties and the changing environments in which he found himself.  His decisions were based for the most part on his relationship and trust in God.  Even though he was a take-charge type of person he learned the art of being gentle and caring for those with whom he came in contact.  The other part of his personality showed up in his ability to analyze situations with great clarity. 

His life seems to be divided into four different periods depending on the events surrounding him.  We first heard about him as an immature 17-year-old who bragged to his brothers about dreams he had.  In these dreams his brothers and other family members would eventually bow down before him. (Gen. 37:5,9) Of course this did not set well with them.  This led, along with other family situations for them to first begin hating him, then wanting to kill him and then actually selling him to some Midianites on the way to Egypt. (Gen. 37)

     We next find him in Egypt in the home of Potiphar where he begins to show his potential.  The Scriptures tell us that, “The Lord was with Joseph, so he became a successful man.” (Gen. 39:2) It goes on to say, “Joseph found favor in his sight and became his personal servant, and Potiphar made him overseer over his house, and all that he owned he put in his charge.” (Gen. 39:4)

The next episode finds Joseph in prison.  He was put there, not for anything that he did, but that he remained true to his commitment to God.  When Potiphar’s wife tried to seduce him several times, he continually refused saying, “How could I do this great evil and sin against God.” (Gen. 39:9) Potiphar’s wife eventually accused him of sexual abuse.  This landed him in jail.  Even there, God was with him, therefore he found favor in the eyes of the jailer.  The chief jailer put him in charge of all of the prisoners that led to his encounter with the cupbearer to Pharaoh, which led him to the next important step in his life.  It is there we see Joseph come to full maturity. 

Joseph spent two years in jail before being called by Pharaoh to interpret two dreams. It turns out that only Joseph I was able to tell the Pharaoh the meaning of those dreams.  He spelled out to him a clear and concise the message from God of what Egypt would be facing for the next fourteen years.  Based on this information Joseph laid out a strategy for the Pharaoh, which allowed for Egypt to persevere through the tough time in their history.  There is a telling statement by Pharaoh to show what God had done in Joseph’s life during the 13 refining years he had spent in Egypt.  “He said, “Can we find a man like this, in whom is a divine spirit?” (Gen. 41:38) Pharaoh then said, “See I have set you over all the land of Egypt.”  (Gen. 41:41)

Joseph was put into the position, not only to save Egypt but, to bring about the salvation of Israel.  For seven years he administered the strategy that he had shared with the Pharaoh.  When the famine came there was plenty food in Egypt because of the job Joseph had done.  The land of Canaan where Jacob was living was going to be affected by the famine that occurred in Egypt.

The second trip by the brothers revealed the true heart of Joseph. With a perfect opportunity for revenge he showed great mercy in forgiving what his brothers had done to him. Of all the defining moments his declaration to the twelve men before him may have been his greatest. He said to them concerning their treatment of him. In verse 5 of chapter 45 he said, “Now do not be grieved or angry with yourselves, because you sold me here, for God sent me here before you to preserve life.” In verses 7 and 8 he said, “God sent me here before you to preserve for you a remnant in the earth, and to keep you alive by a great deliverance. Now, therefore, it was not you who sent me here, but God.”  Following the two trips that Joseph’s brothers made to Egypt.  Joseph was successful in bringing Jacob and his family to Egypt for their survival, where Jacob lived out the rest of his life. After his father’s death Joseph was presented with another opportunity recompence his brothers. They had great fear that he might do just that and came to him with a plea for forgiveness. Once again Joseph showed his character by sharing with them his view of what life had handed him. He stated to them that he had no desire to punish them. He understood that what had happened was according to a plan by God that was bigger and more far reaching than any of them could comprehend. He made a statement and also asked them a question to which the answer should have been obvious by then.   He said, “Do not be afraid, for am I in God’s place”?  He, with that question relinquished any right to judge them or take revenge. With regard to reason he had been brought into Egypt he did say, “As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good in order to bring about this present result, to preserve many people alive. (Gen. 50:19-20)

Defining Moments Introduction

Filed under: Defining Moments — admin @ 4:10 PM

Defining Moments

Recently my wife and I attended a movie titled “Overcomer” produced by the Kendrick Brothers. I will not take the time to go into a lot of the story but there was a short conversation that took place between a blind and dying man and the coach of a local Christian school.  The coach mistakenly entered a hospital room where the man was.  He began to grumble about the fact he had been asked to coach a cross-country team consisting of one young girl. In the ensuing exchange the sick man asked, “When I ask you who you are what is the first thing that comes to mind?” His answer was what one usually says about family connections and then something about being a Christian.

 Related to what is being discussed here I believe a second question that could be asked is, “What are the circumstances in your life’s journey that cause you to relegate your relationship with Christ to third, fourth or even lower place in priority.”

The patient in this moment made a statement that help the coach redefine his view of his walk with Jesus. He said, “Your identity will be tied to whatever you give your heart to.” The intertwining chain of events of his life will ultimately shape every person’s view of God. The last quote from the dying man was, “When you find your identity in the One who created you it will change your perspective.”  My hope as you and I look at the defining moments to follow it will change our view of the special relationship we have with Christ.

As I have considered many times the direction my own life, I have often asked the question, “What if”. What if I had made other choices or taken a different path in life, what would have been the end results? For most of us that kind of decision come too late or the urgency of the present get in the way of giving careful thought to the future or the consequences of the decisions we make. Quite often emotions play a part in the road we follow. Sometimes what we do is based on the old idea that “the grass is greener than where we find ourselves. Job, educational opportunities, friendships and a very important one the person we marry changes our outlook on the future. 

So why is this idea of defining moments of such interest to me? Even though I did not realize it at the time there was a time that I believe was a true turning point in my life. At the age of nine I accepted Christ as my Savior and was baptized. Although I have attended Sunday School and Worship pretty faithfully over the years, I now see that I was on cruise control doing just enough to be able say I was a Christian.  In my late twenties I actually began teaching a group of eleven-year old boys. In spite of my incompetence many are still faithful to God to this day. An event in nineteen seventy-three brought a major defining moment and turning point in my life.  At that time a number of adults took the youth and some young adults on a weekend retreat. Sometime during those two days I came to the realization that I was shortchanging the young people and myself because I truly did not know the very word of God that I was supposed to be passing on to them.  The time away from the normal activities of life the Lord led me to a decision to finally begin spending time in His Word, as I should have been doing all along.  That was my defining moment.  Here I am forty-six years later still committed to doing everything I can to follow what Ezra wrote. “Ezra set his heart to study the law (the Word of God) of the Lord and to practice it, and to teach His statutes (Scripture) and ordinances in Israel” (Chesterfield County). Ezra 7:10 (Parenthesis mine) From then until today this has been my passion, drive etc.

So, what is meant by defining moments. Because I believe that the Bible is the Word of God, it did not take me long to decide as I have done in other studies to look to His what He provided for us for answers.  I found in the stories of the people written about in Scripture a clear picture of the effect that choices made had on not only that person’s life, but in a greater sense the history of mankind. As I began to look at this subject I decided to base what I wrote on the idea that in every person’s life there is that one moment or moment when an act is committed or a decision is made that often sets the course of a person’s life from that point on. After I began to study, I came to the conclusion, from looking into the lives of the people found in the Bible, that life is more like a journey with many such moments. The incidents or happenings might be symbolized as forks in the road. Each time one approaches the fork it will produce either a positive or negative influence thus moving one into a life of good or evil. In the final analysis what man does is either in obedience to God or rebellion against Him. Man, in a way sets his own destiny with the way he responds to his defining moments.

This idea might be compared to the methods used in some of the witnessing tools developed by different ministries. The strategy uses a number of questions that can be answered with either a yes or no. Depending on the response from the person to with whom the gospel is being shared the conversation comes to a close with a no answer or the presenter is able to proceed on to the next step if a person responds positively.  Hopefully, the person witnessing is able to lead the other person into becoming a follower of Christ.

Before we get into the Bible characters, it has been interesting to me how those who have impacted history reached their place of influence. What was the event or events in their lives that put them on the path they took? One of those individuals is Charles Spurgeon the great English preacher who lived in the 1800’s.  In his biography W.Y. Fullerton wrote of the journey that led him to Christ.  Even though he had wrestled with his decision for some time it took an odd set of circumstances that brought about his conversion.  According to the author during a snowstorm in January 1850 the young Spurgeon was unable to get to the church he normally attended. He wound up at a Methodist Church where a layman was preaching because the minister was not able to make it. The message that day struck a chord in the heart of the young man, when the speaker pointed at him stating, he needed to look to Jesus for salvation.  There are a number of others who have a fascinating history such as Martin Luther, William Wilberforce, who spent forty years fighting against slavery, and John Newton, a slave trader turned to Christ in the midst of a terrible storm at sea.  He later became a minister and mentor to William Wilberforce. He is probably, best known today as the writer of “Amazing Grace”.

With that introduction we will now turn to what the people of the Bible have to teach us.  From the very beginning of God’s story there is plenty of evidence in the history of mankind to learn about each man’s defining moments and the consequences that came as a result of them.

March 15, 2018

Obedient To the Heavenly Vision Acts (Recap)

Filed under: Acts — admin @ 5:08 PM

Lesson 45

Obedient to the Heavenly Vision

Acts

I cannot name the number of promises that I have made over the years that have not been fulfilled. There have been so many times when the leader of a conference or worship service have laid a challenge before the group I would get caught up in the moment and go forward with all good intentions of following through with improved actions or attitude. Thankfully there has been one promise I have not gone on. It is the call of Christ to follow Him. There is no way that everything I have done has been pleasing to Him, but I have placed my life in His hands and trust that all of His promises are true.

Christ has given the church a mandate. It is called to be obedient to His call to be a witness in this world in which we are sojourners. In many ways we have failed on the promises we have made. We say that we love Christ but find ourselves full of division and strife. We are called to show those around us Christ and yet we keep our Christianity locked up inside the four walls of the Church. How true it has been said of us that we are often times disobedient to commands of Christ. The book of Acts has shown us how the men and women lived out the good news in all the places to which they were sent.

This lesson will be a quick look back at the book of Acts in its entirety. It will be based on the words spoken by Paul in Acts 26:19 when he told King Agrippa, “I did not prove disobedient to the heavenly vision.”

Acts 1:1-11

Right after His resurrection the Logos of God, Jesus Christ spent forty days with the disciples preparing them for:

  • His departure
  • Their mission

We discovered from their responses to His teaching that they were not ready for the task that lay ahead. They were given the command to wait until they had been equipped and empowered by the Holy Spirit.

Having completed His earthly ministry of instructing the disciples, Jesus ascended into heaven. An angel appeared and gave them a promise that Jesus would return.

  1. Why were these final instructions so important to the disciples?
  2. What is the message that can be learned from these words from the Logos of God?
  3. How will we receive our instructions?
  4. In what ways is the mandate given to them still true?
  5. What is the important promise that we have from the words of the angel?

Acts 1:12-26

This was one of the most crucial times in the life of the disciples. In order for the disciples to become effective witnesses they had to reach a point when all were in agreement of the task ahead. Luke tells us with one mind they were “continually devoting themselves to prayer.” They understood perfectly that they would not be able to work together nor discern the purpose of God for their lives without concentrated prayer. Jesus had told them to wait and wait they did. In a small way they were being obedient to Christ.

  1. Why was the time in the upper room so crucial?
  2. What were the results of this time spent together?
  3. Why does the Church find it difficult to reaching the point of being of one accord?
  4. What lessons can we learn from the actions and attitude of the disciples?

Acts 2:1-13

Finally the day came for which they had been preparing. On the day of Pentecost, the feast of the first harvest, God’s Holy Spirit fell on the disciples in a dramatic way. As a result of the event, accompanied by a sound, devout men from many different lands who had come to the feast rushed to where the disciples were. Each heard the gospel in his own language. Some heard with gladness while others ridiculed the disciples, accusing them of being drunk.

  1. What did God do to assure the greatest exposure to the gospel?
  2. What is the symbolism of the Holy Spirit coming on the day of Pentecost?
  3. What have been times in your life when you sensed the presence of the Holy Spirit in a powerful way?
  4. What were the results from that experience?

Acts 2:14-36

Peter’s sermon covered a lot of ground. He began by telling all there that this was the day which they had been anticipating. He used Old Testament prophecies to indicate that this was the Day of the Lord promised in Joel when the Jews would once again be free and returned to their former stature. Secondly, he pointed out that Jesus whom the Jews leaders had killed had been raised by God and was the fulfillment of all the prophecies.

  1. Why was the Day of the Lord so important to the Jews?
  2. What new fact did Peter add to the mix?
  3. Why did Peter invoke the words of David into his sermon?

Acts 2:37-47

When the people heard the words of Peter they “were pierced to the heart.” They had one question for all of the apostles. “What shall we do?” There was but one answer. “Repent and be baptized in Jesus name for the forgiveness of sin. The response to those words was great. There was added to the church 3000 people. Luke tells us that they were continually devoting themselves to:

  • The teaching of the apostles.
  • Fellowship
  • Breaking of the bread
  • Prayer

They were proving themselves faithful to the decision that had been made to follow Jesus. Where this decision was to lead them they did not know. They just knew that they had a new life that was eternal. Because of their example many more were being added to the church daily.

  1. Why did Peter’s message strike such a chord in their lives?
  2. Why is it that we see so little response like that in the lives of people today?
  3. What important lessons can we learn from the lifestyle of these new followers of Christ?
  4. In which of these do we fall short?
  5. What are the results?

Acts 3:1-10

At this point the apostles continued to worship in the Temple. They did not consider themselves any less of a Jew because they were followers of Christ. With new authority Peter and John healed the beggar at to the Temple grounds. For the first time they saw this beggar in a new light. He was one who needed the healing of the inner man that only Jesus could bring. His response to his healing brought the crowd around them to see what had taken place.

  1. What did the presence of Peter and John at the Temple show about their feelings about the Jewish religion?
  2. Why was the healing of the beggar so important?
  3. What did the two apostles see in this man that caused them to stop and take the time to heal him?
  4. What can we learn from the actions of the apostles as we move about in our world?

Acts 3:11-26

Peter responded to the crowd’s reaction to the healing of the man but giving his second sermon. First he discounted that it was by their power that the healing had taken place. All the credit belonged to Jesus who they had mistreated and executed, even out of ignorance. It was through Him who God had raised from the dead that the miracle had taken place.

He continued by stating that the promised One had suffered just as the prophets proclaimed. Their only hope for forgiveness from the sins committed was to repent and return to relationship with God through Christ.

  1. Why did Peter use this opportunity to preach his second sermon?
  2. Why would it impact the hearts of the people there?
  3. Why is important for us to be sensitive to the Holy Spirit on such occasions?
  4. What did this sermon show of Peter’s understanding of the working of God in history?
  5. Why is important for us to have the same understanding?

Acts 4:1-22

The inevitable took place. At some point there would be confrontation with the Jewish religious leaders. Up to this point the apostles had not invaded their territory, the Temple, with the gospel. Now they had not only healed a man but had preached Jesus who the leaders had killed. There are three key sentences in this chapter that give us the essence of the position of the apostles that would be opposition of the Jews.

  1. Referring to Jesus they said, “There is salvation in no one else; for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among men by which we must be saved.”

Acts 4:12

  1. The Jews thought that they were putting down the apostles by saying they, “began to recognize them as having been with Jesus.” (Acts 4:13)
  2. Peter and John responded to the threats of the leaders by saying, “Whether it is right in the sight of God to give heed to you rather than to God, you be the judge; for we cannot stop speaking about what we have seen and heard.” (4:19)

Since the leaders could not deny the miracle that had taken place they had but one option. They threatened them and let them go. The two had shown themselves obedient to the heavenly mandate.

  1. Why did the Jewish leaders believe it necessary to arrest the two men?
  2. By his responses what were the men trying to say to the leaders?
  3. In what ways is it obvious to the world that we have been with Jesus?
  4. In what ways have you stood up for your faith in spite of the threats that may have thrown at you?

Acts 4:23-32

The church saw the threats as a fulfillment of Psalm 2 which speaks of the world speaking against God’s anointed One. They asked only one thing after this episode. It was that God would, “Grant that Your bondservants may speak Your word with all confidence.” (Acts 4:29) That is the part that the apostles were to carry out. Those things like healings, signs wonders were by God’s power alone through his son Jesus.

God answer their prayers in a dramatic way. The presence of the Holy Spirit was felt in a very tangible way. As a result Luke says, “They began to speak the word with boldness.” (Acts 4:32)

  1. Why were the threats a fulfillment of Psalm 2?
  2. What was the responsibility of the apostles?
  3. Why did they speak of God carrying out healings, signs and wonders?
  4. Why should the prayer of the apostles being ours also?
  5. In what ways has the Holy Spirit manifested His presence in your life?

Acts 4:33-36

As the apostles continued to share the gospel in a powerful way, the church was providing for those that had need in a very tangible way. Barnabas was a prime example who did see his property as his own but sold it willingly so others might have their needs met.

  1. In what ways do the verses show the church in action?
  2. What caused the church to act in this way?
  3. How much of a factor was the preaching of the apostles in all of this activity?
  4. Why was Barnabas singled out as an example of obedience to the gospel?

Acts 5:1-11

Ananias and Sapphira present a sharp contrast to the picture painted of the church in the previous verses. They conspired together to not only withhold part of the selling price of some land they sold but to lie about the amount received. They proceeded to bring only part of the money to the church and were caught in their deception. As a consequence both of them received judgment from God and died.

The affect on the church was understandable. Great fear fell not only on the church but upon everyone who heard what had happened.

  1. In what ways was the behavior of Ananias and Sapphira different from that of Barnabas and the rest of the church?
  2. Why was their punishment so severe?
  3. What would bring about the great reverence and awe that is seen here in your life?

Acts 5:12-16

Luke summarizes the dynamics there were occurring after the death of Ananias and Sapphira. While the apostles were performing signs and wonders the people were responding in different ways. One group respected the church but was afraid to join. Many others were becoming followers. In fact the church had grown so large that Peter and the other apostles could no longer meet the physical needs of the church.

  1. Why were some afraid to become followers of Christ?
  2. What was it that caused many more to become believers?
  3. What good problem did the church experience at this point?
  4. Why was healing limited to the apostles at this point?

Acts 5:17-42

Once again the apostles were detained. This time it was not just Peter and John. That night an angel released them and told them to go back to preaching in the Temple. The next morning when they were found in the Temple they were brought before the Sanhedrin for second trial.

Peter and the others responded in somewhat the same way as before when challenged by the Jews. He said, “We must obey God rather than man.” (Acts 5:29) When the men heard the testimony of the apostles concerning Jesus they became angry and were about to kill them when Gamaliel spoke up. He basically said, “Be careful you do not want to fight against God.” The others listened to him threatened the apostles again, had them flogged and released.

  1. Why were the apostles obedient to the command of the angel when they knew it would lead to trouble?
  2. What statement indicated that the apostles were not intimidated by the Sanhedrin?
  3. Which of the Sanhedrin showed true wisdom?
  4. What would been the results if the apostles had been killed?

Acts 5:42

The response of the apostles was two-fold:

  • Praised God that they were considered worthy to suffer for Him.
  • Went right on teaching and preaching Jesus as the Christ.

 

  1. Why did they disobey the Sanhedrin?
  2. What can we learn from their actions?
  3. When is alright to disobey the authorities?

Acts 6:1-6

The problem of distribution of food was dealt with by the selection of seven men to take care of the situation. From this passage we can see the development of the two positions that are found in the Bible. The apostles represent the teachers of the word and the seven are what is called the deacon or ministry team.

  1. Why could the distribution of the food become a major problem?
  2. What do you think of the way it was handled?
  3. In what way is this a good description of the way the church looks at ministry?

Acts 6:7

The spread of the word of God resulted in more disciples in Jerusalem. Even a great number of the priest were becoming believers.

  1. How much was this a result of the actions of the church?
  2. What did the priests see that drew them to Jesus?
  3. How do all of these things we have seen show the obedience of the church to the commands of Jesus?

Acts 6:8-15

God began to stir in the heart of Stephan. He began to perform signs that had only been done by the apostles. This caught the attention of a group of Jews who were members of the Synagogue of the Freedmen. Stephen defended his position by giving a summary of the history of the Jews culminating with a description of the disobedience and sinfulness of the nation. He even went as far as accusing them of the death of Christ. This led to his stoning. Saul was a witness to all this and gave his approval to his death.

  1. What does this say about God’s expectation of each of us to doing His work?
  2. Why were the men of Synagogue of the Freedmen so opposed to him?
  3. What does this say about the direction that the persecution of the church was now taking?
  4. How would you have defended your faith in the face of such accusations?

Acts 8:1-3

Saul began persecuting the church resulting in many of the believers fleeing from Jerusalem going into Judea and Samaria. The apostles however stayed in Jerusalem.

  1. Why did Saul believe it was his responsibility to persecute the church?
  2. In what ways did the persecution work to the advantage of the church?
  3. Why did the apostles remain in Jerusalem?

Acts 8:4-24

Phillip, one of the seven, began to share the gospel in Samaria. When the apostles heard what was going on they sent Peter and John down to see what was happening. During his time there Peter dealt with the hypocrisy of Simon.

  1. How was this part of God’s plan?
  2. Why did the church send Peter and John to see what was happening in the lives of the people?
  3. What was the problem Peter faced with the magician?

Acts 8:1-40

The gospel was about to reach beyond the borders of Judea and Samaria to a eunuch from Ethiopia. Phillip was sent to Gaza to meet this man. After a sharing of the good news the eunuch accepted Christ and was baptized.

  1. Why did it take someone like Phillip to witness to the eunuch?
  2. What did it take to bring him into a relationship with Christ?
  3. Why was it important for Phillip to be able to explain the Scripture to the conversion of the eunuch?
  4. How much time do you spend in trying to understand God’s word?

Acts 9:1-19

One of the most significant event in all of Christian history was about to take place. On the road to Damascus, Saul was confronted by Jesus and became His follower. During the next several days sitting in Damascus blinded by the light, Saul heard what God had planned for him. Into the picture came Ananias who was willing to go to Saul to complete what God had begun. At his urging Saul was baptized.

  1. What is the importance of the conversion of Saul?
  2. Why did God have planned for his life?
  3. What would have done if you had been in the position of Ananias?

Acts 9:20-30

After his conversion Saul began preaching in Damascus until a plot to kill him was discovered. Leaving there Luke tells us that he proceeded to Jerusalem where he tried to meet with the church. If it had not been for Barnabas he would he would have been totally ignored. Once he was accepted he began to argue with the Jews again there was an attempt to kill so he left for Tarsus.

Acts 9:31

With Saul no longer persecuting the church was at peace and continued to grow.

Acts 9:32-43

Peter’s began to expand his ministry going first to Lydda where he healed Aeneas. He then travelled on to Joppa where he brought Dorcas (Tabitha) back to life. He then stayed with a tanner named Simon. Other than his follow up work in Samaria this is the first mention of an apostle venturing outside of Jerusalem.

  1. Why did it take so long for the apostles to leave Jerusalem?
  2. Why was it important for him to be in those two cities?
  3. What was the significance of his sojourn with Simon?

Acts 10:1-8

In these verses Cornelius who is to play a role in Peter’s life is described as a godly, well respected Roman Centurion. This man was searching for answers to life.

Acts 10:9-17

God was preparing Peter for his meeting with Cornelius. A vision of unclean animals came before him with a command to eat some of them. Peter would even consider doing so because he was a Jew. He awoke not knowing what the vision meant.

Acts 10:18-23

The men from Cornelius came to Peter as instructed to get him to return with them to Caesarea. He did so with the full approval of God.

Acts 10:24-48

Peter willingness to go with the men led to the conversion of Cornelius and his whole household. As important as that was, Peter learned a great lesson the Jews had never understood. He discovered that God loved the Gentiles and they would be accepted into His kingdom in the same as the Jews. Both Jew and Gentile would have to become followers of Christ through His grace. Peter made a key statement which affects us even today. He said, “Surely no one can refuse the water for these to be baptized

Acts 11:1-18

When Peter returned to Jerusalem he faced a hostile reception from the church who questioned why he had spent time with the Gentiles. When he explained how the Holy Spirit had come upon them the church began to praise God for the work He had done in the lives of the Gentiles.

Acts 11:19-26

Some of the men who had been scattered by the persecution came to Antioch and began a church. The church in Jerusalem heard of the work and sent Barnabas to evaluate what was taking place. Later as the church grew Barnabas set off to get Saul to help. The two of them along with others were there for a whole year teaching the disciples.

Acts 11:27-30

A prophet named Agabus came to Antioch and shared that there was a famine in all the world. It was determined that a gift would be sent to the brethren in Jerusalem. It was be taken by Saul and Barnabas.

Acts 12:1-17

For the first time the apostles were affected by the persecution of the church. James, the brother of John, was put to death by Herod. When he saw that his action pleased the Jews he had Peter arrested intending that he would also be put to death.

Peter was rescued by an angel. He then proceeded to the house of Mary to let the disciples know he was still alive.

Acts 12:18-19

Having allowed their prisoner escape the guards were executed. This was a common practice in that part of the world. Herod returned to Caesarea without having accomplished his goal.

Acts 12:20-23

Because Herod accepted the adulation of the people of Tyre and Sidon as if he were a god, God struck him dead.

Acts 12:24

In spite of all the persecution from the Jews the word of God continued to “grow and multiply”

Acts 12:25

Barnabas and Saul having competed the mission to Jerusalem returned to Antioch carrying with them John Mark

Acts 13 and 14

The church at Antioch commissioned Barnabas and Saul to go on a missionary trip into present day Turkey. They took with them John Mark who would leave them at Pamphylia and return to Jerusalem. Their usual pattern was to begin the work among the Jews. When the Jews rejected the word they would then they would share the gospel with the Gentiles. After they had spent a good deal of time in Turkey they returned to Antioch and reported all that God had done through them.

Acts 15:1-35

The timing of Paul’s return to Antioch could not have been better. Some men from Judah came down and stated that accepting Christ was not enough. They wanted the Gentiles to be circumcised just as all the Jews were. Paul and Barnabas disagreed and it was decided to take the take the matter to the leaders in Jerusalem. The outcome of the debate did not require the Gentiles to be circumcised. As would be expected the church at Antioch rejoiced over the decision.

Acts 15:36-41

After Paul and Barnabas had been in Antioch for a while it was determined that they would return to the churches they had started to see how they were doing. They went their separate ways because Barnabas wanted to take John Mark with them and Paul was totally against the idea. Barnabas took John Mark and sailed off to Cyprus. Paul took Silas with him and went back into Asia Minor.

Acts 16:1-11

As Paul travelled through the cities of Derbe and Lystra he found Timothy who would become one of his disciples. Eventually he believed that God was leading him into Europe. Based on a vision he and his companions set sail for Macedonia.

Acts 16:12-40 Adventures in Philippi

Paul’s time in Philippi began with finding a group of women praying by the riverside. Out of that encounter came the first convert in Europe. When God touched her heart Lydia, a woman from Thyatira, and her whole family was baptized.

The second person who would impact Paul’s ministry was the slave girl who told fortunes. She followed Paul around until he finally cast the demon from her. As a result her owners had Paul and Silas flogged and thrown into jail.

There Paul met the jailer. After an earthquake the jailer came to Paul with a very important question. “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” Here a hardened Roman jailer responded to Paul’s words, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household.”     (Acts 16:31)

As a result the jailer and his family became followers of Christ and subsequently took care of Paul’s physical needs. Following his night in jail was released after calling the Roman leaders to him. He then left Philippi.

Acts 17- 18:17

The Second missionary trip continued with stops in Thessalonica, Corinth, Berea and Athens where he met with both success but also continued persecution. Most of the trouble came from the Jews who Paul constantly tried to reach. It was in Thessalonica that the charge was made against the missionary team. The accusers said, “These men who have upset the world have come here, also. (Acts 17:6) His primary success was with the Gentiles. In Athens he probably experienced very few people coming to the Lord.

Acts 18:18-22

Paul then set out to return to Antioch. Into the Paul’s life came Aquila and Priscilla. They were a couple who had been forced out of Rome. They would become valuable co-workers with him. He left them to carry on the work in Ephesus while he continued on his trip.

 

Acts 18:23

On Paul’s third and last missionary journey to he travelled through Galatia and Phrygia encouraging the saints along the way.

Acts 18:24-28

Apollos, from Alexandria, described as one mighty in the Scriptures arrived in Ephesus. He was mentored by Aquila and Priscilla and then he proceeded into Achaia where he refuted the teachings of the Jews.

Acts 19:1-41

After spending time in those areas Paul went to Ephesus where he spent about two years performing miracles and preaching the gospel. It was during his stay that he ran into trouble with Demetrius and other craftsmen who made statutes of the goddess Artemis. After a near riot the town clerk calmed down the crowd.

Acts 20:1-6

After this episode Paul and his companions left for Macedonia and Greece. Not much is said about this trip. It is possible that he had gone to the different cities to collect the gift that had been promised for the church in Jerusalem.

Acts 20:7- 12

While at Troas he spent all night teaching the disciples before embarking on the final leg of his journey to Antioch. During the night Eutychus, one of the young men, fell from the window and was killed. Paul went down and brought him back to life and then returned to his teaching.

Acts 20:13-16

As Paul left Troas he intended to go to Jerusalem in order to be there by the feast of Pentecost. He made a stopover at Miletus.

Acts 20:17-38

His intentions were to by-pass Ephesus. He did however call the leadership to him. When the men arrived he did two things. He rehearsed his ministry among the people of Ephesus. His final words to them were a warning that they were to be on guard against those who would try to undermine the church, especially those who would arise from within the body. After praying with them he left on his way to Jerusalem.

Acts 21:1-14

On his trip he stopped in Caesarea where he stayed at the home of Phillip. There he received a warning not to go Jerusalem. He could not be dissuaded from going so the journey continued.

Acts 15-25:12

What started out well soon disintegrated into a number of trials for Paul. His report to the church was full of hope and received praise. His problems began when he compromised to maintain the peace within the body. Soon he would be accused of bringing a Gentile into the Temple which led to his arrest.

Over the next chapters Paul defends himself before the mob that had seized him. This led to his trial before Felix. When he was replaced then Festus was the next person before whom he had to defend himself. When the trial seemed to be going nowhere Paul appeal to Caesar for resolution of the problem.

Acts 25:13-26:32

When Festus agreed for Paul to go to Caesar he ran into a problem. He had nothing which justified bringing the case to Caesar. When King Agrippa arrived for a visit it was decided that Paul would have a hearing before both men. When Paul was brought before them he once again gave his testimony adding the phrase which is the title that fits all that had been accomplished by the men and women in the book of Acts. He said, “I did not prove disobedient to the heavenly vision.” (Acts 26:19)

As Paul continued Festus accused him of have gone mad. Paul defended himself by speaking about the knowledge of the things of which he spoke. Agrippa responded because he thought Paul was trying to convince him to become a Christian. As far we know this never happened.

The outcome of the hearing was the decision to send Paul to Rome. This was done even though both men believed that Paul had done nothing deserving the death sentence that the Jews wanted.

Acts 27

The journey to Rome was interrupted by a terrible storm that put the life of Paul and others on the ship in danger. When they had survived this dangerous situation they spent three months on the island of Malta. While there Paul proved true to his calling as he ministered to the people of the island.

Acts 28

This chapter finds Paul in Rome where he once again tried to reach the Jews for Christ. Sadly he met with the same resistance. He did however spend his years there ministering to all who came to his house. Luke leaves us with Paul being faithful to the heavenly vision that he had received some Twenty some years earlier.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rome At Last Acts 28

Filed under: Acts — admin @ 5:03 PM

Lesson 44

Rome at Last

Acts 28

I do not know about you, but I have found over the years that the anticipation of some events is more fun and fulfilling that the event itself. It seems that I build up such an expectation for what is going to occur that whenever it does take place it hardly ever turns exactly the way I thought it would be. It therefore disappoints me and being let down sets in. This probably occurs because, if I am truly honest, it is all about me.

There have been times when I have gone to a conference or some other training and came away with the thought I would have not done it that way. Even worse is to walk away and feel that I got nothing from the whole presentation, because the presenter really did not address the issues that were of interest to me. Here again it was all about me.

As I think about all that has occurred in our study of Acts I have, just as I prepare this last chapter, I have come to realize that none of this is about me. If I am willing to put aside my own agenda then God is able to speak through whomever he desires. I will learn so much more if I keep my heart and mind open to the moving of God in my life.

A good question for us to ask ourselves at this point is why the church has disappointed us in times in the past. What has taken place that we find the results of what we do not gratifying. We expect, and then it does not happen. We plan and those plans fall apart. We come to depend on others only to find them less than we expected them to be.

The question we must ask ourselves when these things happen may have two different answers. Should we continue to be faithful to our calling no matter what happens around us? Or are we more inclined to give up because we feel let down? Do we really expect the church to revolve around us?  Only when we act in accordance with a biblical perspective do we truly reflect a Christ-like attitude. We can look to Paul on this final leg of his journey to Rome to see the behavior and mindset we are to possess.

Acts 28:1-6a

God had brought Paul and the others safely through a storm unlike one he had ever faced. They landed on the island of Malta. The place indicated by the angel. There they found a friendly community. Paul had still not made it to Rome. He did not use that as an excuse to do nothing. As the others began to build a fire because of the rain and cold, he began to gather wood to place on it. Paul never saw any task that needed to be done as to too menial. It seemed that all of his effort had been for naught when a deadly viper attached itself to his hand. The people thought this incident was probably his punishment for having committed murder. He however shook the snake off into the fire and went on with his business with no ill effects from the bite.

  1. How would you expect Luke’s narrative to read at this point?
  2. What seems to be missing?
  3. What was the attitude of the natives?
  4. What part did this have to play in the fact that God had designated this island for them to land?
  5. What does his activity show us about Paul?
  6. What would his thoughts have been when he had been bitten by the snake?
  7. How did they differ from those of the natives?

Acts 28:6b

When Paul did not die their assessment of him changed completely. Now instead of calling him a murderer they began to view him as a god.

  1. Why did God save him from the deadly bite?
  2. Why did their view of him change?
  3. What causes us to change our opinion of people?
  4. Why would they think he was a god?

Acts 28:7-9

It was evident by the events that took place on Malta that God was in no way finished with Paul. Rome still lay ahead for him, but in the meantime there were needs to be met among the people of the island.

Publius, a large land owner entertained them. When Paul discovered that the father of Publius was ill he went in and prayed and laid hands on him. God healed the man of his fever and dysentery. As would be expected when the news got out of the healing all who had needs came to Paul for a cure.

  1. What evidence is do we have that God was not through with Paul?
  2. What did it mean to him to be able to heal the father of Publius?
  3. Why had God brought Paul to this island?
  4. Why is there no mention that he shared the gospel with them?
  5. What does this incident say about the kind of ministry we are to have?
  6. In what ways can we minister to total strangers?
  7. When is it not appropriate to use confrontational evangelism?
  8. What does this say about God’s mercy?

Acts 28:10-11

Because of Paul’s actions and the behavior of those with him they gained the respect of those on the island. In a more tangible way the natives outfitted them as they prepared to sail. They had been there for three months and then set out on another Alexandrian ship which had wintered at the island. Luke describes the ship in some detail.

  1. Why is the way we behave very important to the way we impact people?
  2. In what ways can we earn the respect of those around us?
  3. What did the generosity of the people say about their feelings for Paul?
  4. Why did Luke include the details about the ship?

Acts 28:12-15

The last leg of the journey brought them to Syracuse on the southern tip of Sicily where they stayed for three days. Sailing from there they arrived in Rhegum, then on to Puteoli where they found some disciples. It is amazing that they were allowed to stay with them for seven days. From there they proceeded to Rome.

When disciples in that area heard that Paul had arrived they came from the Market Appius and Three Inns to meet him. Paul was very thankful to see them and was greatly encouraged.

  1. Why would the centurion allow Paul to spend seven days with the disciples of Puteoli?
  2. What would he have shared with them?
  3. Why would Paul need the encouragement of the disciples of the Market of Appius and Three Inns?
  4. What were the things for which Paul gave thanks?

Acts 28:16

When Paul arrived at Rome he was allowed to stay by himself. He only had one soldier staying with him.

  1. What did this say about Paul that they allowed him to stay by himself with only one soldier?
  2. What factors led to this scenario?
  3. What kind of regard would people have for us if we had gone through tough times?
  4. What would cause them to act that way towards us?

Acts 28:17-20

Paul wasted little time in calling for meeting with the leading Jews of the city. He had only been in Rome three days when he requested to see them. When they arrived he declared his innocence of any charges they may have heard about including those dealing specifically with his relations with his own people. He then recounted all that had taken place in Jerusalem and Caesarea that had led to his appeal to Caesar.

  1. Why did Paul feel it necessary to meet with the Jewish leaders there in Rome?
  2. Why did he begin with declaring his innocence of the charges that had been leveled against him?
  3. Why did he interject the events that had led to his arrival in Rome?
  4. In what ways was this the best approach for Paul to take?
  5. What did he hope to accomplish by meeting them early in his sojourn in Rome?
  6. How did this play a part in why God had brought him to Rome?

Acts 28:21

After all that had been taking place the answer given to Paul by the Jews may seem a bit surprising. They said they had heard nothing from the Jews in Jerusalem about this matter.

With that subject aside they shared with Paul a desire to hear about Christianity. One of the reasons was because of the criticism leveled against it.

  1. Why does it seem strange that the Jews in Rome had not heard anything about Paul’s situation other than what he had just told them?
  2. What does this indicate about the attitudes of the Jews in Jerusalem?
  3. Why did they dismiss this subject so quickly?
  4. What did really want to hear from Paul?
  5. In what ways was this to be a fulfillment of the reason Paul had been sent to Rome?
  6. What would Paul say about his situation at this point?

Acts 28:22-23

Because the Jews desired to hear about Christianity a scheduled day was set for them to come to the house where was staying. Remember he was still a prisoner so they had to meet with him there. Paul shared with them three different things about what the Jews called a sect. As he had done time and time again in many different places and circumstances, he:

  • Testified about the kingdom of God.
  • Testified concerning Jesus.
  • Used the Old Testament as proof of what was being taught.

We can only imagine the passion and intensity of that time which lasted from morning to evening. How different this was than the way that the Bible is taught in most churches today. Quite often to speak or teach more than 30-60 minutes makes people squirm and ready to leave.

  1. Why did the Jews have to come to Paul?
  2. In what ways was his approach no different than he had previously used?
  3. Why was his strategy so important?
  4. What was different than our approach to Bible Study today?
  5. Why have we lost the intensity and passion displayed in this session?

Acts 28:24-28

Sadly, as had happened so many times Paul witness had brought about division. Some found his words very persuasive while others did not accept his words and believe. Because of the divisive atmosphere all of them began to leave. Paul had some parting words for them which they would recognize from the book of Isaiah. (Isaiah 6:9-10) It basically says that no matter how much they heard or saw they still would not believe. He finished up saying that the gospel they refused to accept had been sent to the Gentiles who would listen to the message.

  1. After such a passionate presentation why was there still division among the Jews?
  2. How different was their attitude than what we face today?
  3. Why did Paul use the Scripture found in Isaiah 6:9-10
  4. Why did they not stay to hear more of what he had to say?
  5. Why did he end with the fact that the Gentiles would listen?

Acts 28:29-30

For the next two years Paul continued to entertain guests in his dwelling place. He continued to proclaim the kingdom of God and teaching about the Lord Jesus unhindered.

  1. How did Paul spend the next two years of his life?
  2. What was the difference between his work then, than what he had done in his earlier years?
  3. What does mean when Luke tells us that he was able to teach with all openness and unhindered?
  4. How could Luke say the above since we know that Paul was still under house arrest?
  5. What does Paul’s example say to us about the way we are to approach the calling that God has given us?

Even with the ending of the Book of Acts we know that it was not the end of Paul’s work. God still had further plans for him. After the two years he was released and went into Spain. Later he would return to Rome. He was rearrested and finally beheaded on the Appian Way outside of Rome in about AD 66. While he was in Rome the second time he wrote at least 2 Timothy which spoke of his Imminent going home.

You-

  • Paul got Rome, but it was not as he expected. Think about your ministry as circumstances may change?
  • Look at Paul’s attitude when things did not work out as expected? See 2 Tim. 2:8-9
  • Look at the different ways that he impacted the people along the way.
  • What impact do you think that he had on the people in Rome? See Phil. 1:13-14
  • Pray that you will be able to adapt to change in a positive way that will only enhance the way you impact those around.

We-

Quite often we are given unexpected opportunities to touch the lives of people we meet. Things do not always go according to a plan. We should look at this as the plan of God for our lives. God is always working behind the scenes to bring about His purpose. We should be like Paul who continued to adapt to all the different circumstances in which he found himself along the journey from Caesarea to Rome. Wherever God puts us should be place that we say what can I do to make Christ known?

Additional Notes

C-Paul the prisoner became Paul the healer. The father of Publius was healed of dysentery and fever. Publius proved to be a gracious host to all of the occupants of the ship. When the people of Malta discovered that Publius’s father had been made well they began to bring others to Paul for healing. (Acts 28:7-9)

C-When it came time for Paul and the others to depart, the people of the island provided supplies for them. (Acts 28:10)

C-After spending three months on the island Paul and the others continued their voyage to Rome on another Alexandrian ship. Finally after a long delay Paul finally arrives at Rome. (Acts 28:11-14)

C-Some of the believers living in Rome came to the Market at Appius and Three Inns to meet Paul and his companions. He was encouraged when he saw the men who had come to meet him. (Acts 28:15)

GC-A follower of Christ gives encouragement to those who may be facing some adversity in their lives. (Acts 28:15)

 

Encouragement in the Darkest Hour Acts 27

Filed under: Acts — admin @ 4:48 PM

Lesson 43

Encouragement in the Darkest Hour

Acts 27

There have been a number of situations in my life when I needed someone to provide encouragement. I did not realize it then but those who offer the greatest encouragement are those who had true wisdom to grasp the situation and help me walk through some of those dark hours. One of those times involved my working relationship with an organization. They had determined that we would part company, but kept me on for over 6 months after I was terminated. Go figure. During those months when there seem to be no place for me to go I spent many days with my minister who prayed with me and encouraged me not to lose faith and not give up. Out of those times I came to realize that God was working behind the scenes making a place for me at the International Mission Board where I spent the next 26 years of my working career.

We all need the kind of people and maybe just that one person to come along side us when the going gets really rough. All we have to do is look around us at Church to see that they are everywhere. As we have face crisis after crisis there are those who are steady as a rock consistently guiding us through the shoals that could rip us apart. It always hurts when we see those we thought were the strongest walk away when times become very difficult.

I love the story of Valley Forge. During the Revolutionary War the American army arrived there to spend the winter. The conditions were terrible with little food to sustain them, no decent clothes to protect them. It would have been the perfect situation for everyone of them to desert. What kept them there, humanly speaking, was their dedication to the cause, the leadership of George Washington and the training of a German officer, Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben who drilled them until they became the core of the army which eventually defeated Cornwallis at Yorktown.

In today’s lesson Paul and those with him found themselves in dire straits. We will see how he and the others dealt with the situation.

Acts 26:32-27:1-3

It is interesting that there is still no indication that Festus, King Agrippa and the others who had heard Paul speak had anything to write to Caesar. His appeal to Caesar was there only reason to send him to Rome.

Paul, along with some others, was turned over a Centurion named Julius. Their journey on the Adramyttian ship was broken up by a number of stops along the coast. Adramyttian was a gulf on the northeast corner of what is present day Turkey.

Luke indicates that there was one person other than Luke who went with Paul. He was a Thessalonian named Aristarchus.

One of the stops that the ship made was at Sidon. While the ship was docked the Centurion allowed Paul to visit his friends there so that they could provide some care for him.

  1. What was Festus’s reasoning for sending Paul to Rome?
  2. Why would Aristarchus, as well as Luke, continue to travel with him?
  3. What could be the consequences for them if they stayed with Paul all the way to Rome?
  4. What does it say about the relationship of the two men with Paul?
  5. What could they hope to do for him along the way?

Acts 27:4-8

On the next leg of the trip the crew sailed the ship along the coast line and north of Cyprus which afforded them protection from the wind. Arriving at Myra in Lycia the prisoners were transferred to an Alexandrian ship on its way to Italy. Evidently, the Adramyttian ship was headed for its home port and could not carry them to their final destination. As they left Myra they encountered some rough seas and strong winds but finally arrived at a place on the coast of Crete called Fair Havens.

Acts 27:9-13

Evidently they spent some time at Fair Havens and then it was determined that they should go on although the time for safe travel had passed. Paul tried to warn them of the possible consequences of travelling during such a dangerous time. He feared that there could even be loss of life. Here was a voice who was truly concerned for the welfare of all those who were aboard the ship. His was the voice of experience, who had been on a number of sea voyages and understood the weather of that part of the world?

The commander listened to the ship’s captain and decided that they would proceed with the trip. One reason alone dictated the decision. Fair Havens was not a suitable port at which they could spend the winter. They were hoping to reach Phoenix further west on the coast line which faced southwest which gave better protection. When a calmer wind came up they thought that they could then carry out their plan and began sailing along the coast.

  1. Why would the ship’s captain want to go on if it was not safe to travel at that time of year?
  2. What made Paul think that they might listen to him?
  3. Why were Paul’s words so important?
  4. What would have given Paul credibility in the eyes of the Centurion?
  5. Why would he listen to the captain and crew over the objections of Paul?
  6. What were the indications that made them think they had made the right decision?
  7. What are some things in your own life that seemed to be so right but turned out to be wrong?
  8. Why is important for us to listen to that voice of warning even if it comes from an unexpected source?

Acts 27:14

Trouble was on the horizon. The storm that came upon them is not unlike the ones that hit the northeast part of our country. The term that Luke used was Euroquilla. We would call it a Northeaster.

Acts 27:15-19

In these verses Luke describes the horrifying situation in which all on the vessel found themselves. They tied cables around the ship to keep it from breaking apart. Anchors were cast out in from of the ship so they could be pulled along through waters. As a last resort the cargo was jettisoned and then the tackle was thrown overboard.

  1. What situations in your life come to mind would be equivalent to the situation in which the people on this ship were experiencing?
  2. How did you handle what was happening?
  3. How efforts did the crew undertake to deal with the storm?
  4. What was missing from the actions?

Acts 27:20

After the men had tried everything they knew to do only to find themselves still helpless in the face of the storm, they gave up hope of surviving. Even Luke and Aristarchus were caught up in the despair they witnessed among the crew.

  1. What more could be done by the crew to save everyone aboard ship?
  2. Why did Luke despair of being rescued?
  3. What is normally our response when the situation becomes as desperate in which these men found themselves?
  4. In what ways are you the same as the crew and Paul’s travelling companions?

 

Acts 27:21

During the struggles the men faced in trying to stay alive, Paul is conspicuously absent from the narrative. Because of the words he was to now share with the men there can only be one answer. He had spent this time in a prayer. Everyone else had lost hope but Paul was calling on the God who controlled the storm. Part of that prayer may have been to remind God, and to keep up his own courage, that he had been promised that he would witness in Rome. At that point Paul once again made his appearance.

After man had tried everything to survive and had failed, Paul once again spoke. His words were meant to get the attention of everyone. He first admonished them for not listening to him in the first place and not embarking on this dangerous journey. He seemed to be saying to them all, “Bad decisions may lead to devastating consequences.” Having reminded them of his warning he then spoke words of encouragement. His message was clear and to the point. God had an angel to tell him that he would stand before Caesar. Not only that but that all of the people on the ship would be brought safely through the storm. Then he said the words that the men needed to hear. Luke writes, “Keep up your courage men.” This was easy to say. It was what followed that would have brought the real encouragement to them. In the midst of the terrible storm, Paul said, “I believe God that it will turn out exactly as I have been told.” He even told them that they had to “run aground on a certain island.”

  1. Why did Paul wait so long to speak?
  2. Why did he admonish them on their bad and dangerous decision?
  3. What lessons can we learn from his words?
  4. What were the words of real encouragement?
  5. How had they missed the point of what he had said earlier up to that point in time?
  6. Upon hearing the words what might be their expectations?
  7. How have you responded to words of encouragement in your darkness hour?
  8. Why was the mention of the destination so important?

Acts 27:27-29

God did not immediately calm the storm after Paul’s words. There still came a time of great concern as the crew began to realize that they possibly approaching land because the water became shallower. Their new fear was that they might run aground on rocks. They tried to slow the ships progress but lowering some anchors. Luke tells us that, “they wished for daylight.” At that point they would be able to better assess their situation.

  1. Why did God delay in His response to Paul’s encouraging words?
  2. What had to occur before they would be fulfilled?
  3. Why do we expect God to get us out our darkest hours immediately?
  4. Why does He sometime seem to be taking His own good time?
  5. Which is more important the working out of His purpose or our well being? Why?

Acts 27:29-32

Some sailors tried to desert the others. As has been seen before Paul began to step to the forefront of the crisis and with a calm authority began to assert himself. He was now in charge of the situation and in his hands everything was going to work itself out. Paul was emphatic in his words to the Centurion that everyone must remain on board in order for all to survive. Without the sailors there would be no one who knew how to guide the ship through the treacherous waters ahead. This time the Centurion listened at had the ropes cut so the life boats would drop away.

  1. What did this act show us about the character of these men?
  2. What characteristics do we see in Paul that has played out throughout this whole drama?
  3. Why was it important for everyone to stay together?
  4. What would have been the consequences of yet another self serving decision by the crew?
  5. Why did the centurion listen to Paul at this point?

Acts 27:33-38

Finally with the worst of the storm over, Paul encouraged the men to eat. There are at least two important factors underlying what he did.

  • Psychological – After being under such extreme stress. Paul was saying to them all would be saved. If they were going to die why bother to eat at all.
  • Physiological – They would need the strength to carry out the tasks of reaching land.

As an example he took some bread broke it, blessed it and ate. At that point the other 276 men on the ship followed his lead and began to eat. Once they had eaten their fill they dumped the rest of the cargo overboard.

  1. Why did Paul encourage the men to eat?
  2. What were the underlying reasons for Paul’s actions?
  3. Why did the men listen to Paul?
  4. What indicated they had confidence in what Paul had said and done?
  5. What lessons can be learned from his actions?

 

Acts 27:39-41

Finally land was observed. They crew determined to try to ground the ship on the beach. All did not go well as the ship hit a reef which began to break the ship apart.

  1. What can we say about this spotting of land at this point?
  2. In what ways do you see God at work?

Acts 27:42-44

The soldiers wanted to kill all of the prisoners so they would not escape. This would have included Paul. The centurion stopped them from carrying out the execution because he wanted to save Paul. All those on the ship were ordered to make it to the beach any way they could. All made it safely to the beach just as Paul had said.

  1. Why did the soldiers want to kill the prisoners?
  2. How was this desire short-sighted?
  3. What was wrong with this decision?
  4. Why did the centurion want to save Paul?
  5. What do we see in the whole process of God working from day one?

You-

  • Reflect on those times you consider the darkest hours of your life.
  • As you look back in what ways did you see God working?
  • Think about those who were the greatest encouragers.
  • What were the qualities that those who encouraged you possessed?
  • Look around to see those who may need encouragement from you?
  • Remember your best opportunity will come among those who have experienced the same things that you have.

We have been in the ship being tossed about for some time. This is a day when the new day has come and we have spotted the beach which will provide safety and a future. The opportunity for us to start anew is just waiting for us to take advantage of what God has already done and wants to do. Let us continue to look for ways that we can build each other up as we serve the God who has rescued each and every one of us. We should be encouraged that we have had among us those who have had the wisdom to keep us from becoming discouraged and giving up. Let us continue depend on God to help us accomplish what cannot be done humanly speaking. He has a special future for us to impact those around us.

Additional notes:

C-Paul was sent to Rome in the custody of a centurion named Julius. The ship on which Paul and Luke sailed was soon caught in a Northeaster. Finally the ship was shipwrecked off the coaster of Malta. All of the men on the ship were saved. (Acts 27:1-44)

GC-A Christian believes God will accomplish what He has said He will do.                         (Acts 27:25; Rom. 4:21)

RT-In the raging storms of life we can be assured that God is true to His word and will bring us through to safety or into heaven with Him. How different is Paul’s response than that of the disciples when they out, “We are perishing.” (Acts 27:25; Luke 7:24)

 

 

 

 

 

Who Is the Prisoner? Acts 25:23 – 26:32

Filed under: Acts — admin @ 4:04 PM

Lesson 42

Who is the Prisoner?

Acts 25:23 – 26:32

It may seem strange that I have titled this lesson, “Who is the Prisoner?” Each time I read this passage I picture a contrast between those who appear to be free but are imprisoned and the one who was in chains but free. What does it take for a person to truly be in trapped by his or her on decisions?   I can only answer for myself. As I look back on my life I sometimes wonder how different choices would have made a difference in my life. One thing that I struggle with constantly is procrastination. I am a putter off of tasks that need to be done. Quite often it only under a deadline do I finally get around to finishing a task. Of course this means that I do not do my best. I remember so clearly having term papers that literally finished up in the eleventh hour before they were to be turned in. This may seem like a small thing but it is systematic of other things that I do not have space to tell that have affected my life. These and many others have entrapped and held me prisoner. They have kept me from achieving all that I could have for God.

Every once in awhile there is the glimpse of the kind of freedom that is available in Christ. When I turn over certain aspects of my life He opens a window into what He desires for me. He has allowed me to do things that have been beyond my wildest dreams. The opportunity to write these lessons has been one of those times. Over the years as I read the Bible and wrote down my thoughts I never dreamed that one day I would ever being doing something like this. The Lord gets all the credit. First he gave me the passion for His word and then kept me at the task of studying and meditating on it all of these years. I cannot wait to see what He may do next.

Churches also get caught in traps and prisons that keep them from being healthy and thus growing. Each of us could probably add to the list but here are few that keep the church imprisoned.

  • Tradition that strangles the life from the body.
  • Apathy that allows members to drift through their church life.
  • Refusal to trust leadership as it tries to shepherd the church
  • Lack of desire to truly know what God has in store for the Church.
  • Lack of passion in studying God’s word.
  • Lack of passion in reaching a lost world for Christ.

As we can see these and many others hinder the work of God as we focus on ourselves. With these attitudes it is difficult for the Holy Spirit to break through and give direction and life to the church. We can use this lesson today to show that those of the world are trapped by their desire to have all the world has to offer.   How empty that is in comparison to what Paul had been given, peace and true freedom in Christ.

Acts 25:23

What a contrast is seen in this one verse. Luke writes that of the great pomp by which King Agrippa, Bernice, Festus and prominent people of the military and the city. Finally after they were all in their places Festus summoned for Paul to be brought in to the gathering. As is seen in a later verse he entered, probably under guard and in chains.

  1. What was the purpose of such a great display by those who were part of this meeting?
  2. Why was it necessary for so many to be there?
  3. How could it have been handled in a different way?
  4. How did Paul’s appearance differ from all of the others?
  5. Why are we so impressed by people important by worldly standards?

Acts 25:24-27

Festus begins by laying out before everyone, including Paul, the reason that he had called everyone together. He shared how the Jews had made many charges and asking for the death of Paul. As was mentioned previously, Festus was a just and fair man. Here again he displays those characteristics as he stated, that for all of the charges brought to him he found nothing in them that would worthy of putting Paul to death. He then presents his dilemma. He need all of them to help him write to the Emperor the reason for sending Paul, the prisoner, to him.

  1. Why did Festus call the meeting?
  2. Why was it important for Paul to be there?
  3. What does the actions of Festus show us about his character?
  4. How do our actions sometimes differ from the way Festus handled this situation?
  5. Why did Festus not buy into the accusations of the Jews?
  6. Why did he not just let Paul go free?

Acts 26:1

Before making a decision Agrippa wanted to hear what Paul had to say on his own behalf. Paul responded as he had before with a gesture to get the attention of everyone in the room. Then he began to give a defense.

  1. Why did Agrippa want to hear from Paul?
  2. What does it say about what he had heard from Festus?
  3. Why did Paul stretch out his hand?
  4. How would you handle such an opportunity to defend yourself?

Acts 26:2-3

In contrast with what had previously occurred Paul could sense that he was going to get a fair hearing in that setting. In fact his opening statement indicated this. He was pleased to be able to speak before King Agrippa because as Luke wrote, “You are an expert in all customs and questions among the Jews.” Based on this fact he asked that those there be patient as he presented his defense. Not only was this true, as we have already noted, Festus was a just and well respected governor.

  1. Why did Paul believe he would get a fair hearing before all present?
  2. Why was it important to him that Agrippa understood the Jews?
  3. Why did Paul ask for patience as he made his presentation?
  4. Why does the church need those it considers knowledgeable and wise to make decisions for it?
  5. Why do we need patience in dealing with complex situations?

Acts 26:4-6

Building on the fact that Agrippa would understand what he was saying Paul began to give a quick bio of his life. His main point was that everything in his early life pointed to a career as a Pharisee. As he did in Philippians 4:6 he wanted to emphasize his total commitment to the keeping the law in the best tradition of the Pharisees.

  1. Why did Paul believe it was important to share his life’s story before those assembled?
  2. Why did he feel comfortable doing it?
  3. Why did he emphasize his dedication to the law?
  4. What does your testimony look like?
  5. Is there the same kind of commitment that we see in Paul?

Acts 26:7-8

Paul then transitions to explain the real reason he believes that the Jews have brought the charges against him. He begins by stating that it is because he believes in the hope of the promise that had been made the Jewish nation from their very beginning. They were looking for the very thing that Paul had found. He then asked the entire assembly the key question that he had addressed before when he met with the Pharisees and Sadducees. He said, “Why is considered incredible among you people if God does raise the dead?”

  1. Why did Paul seem to switch gears right in the middle of his testimony?
  2. In what way were the Jews and Paul looking for the same thing?
  3. Why did He not use the word Messiah or the name of Christ at this point?
  4. How did his question fit in with his defense?
  5. How would you answer his question if presented to you?

Acts 26:8-11

After the break he returns to his narrative. He explains the intensity with which he began to persecute all those who believed in the name of Jesus of Nazareth. Following are the things he carried out against the church:

  • Locked up many of the saints
  • Cast his vote against those being put to death, for example Stephen.
  • Punished them in all of the synagogues.
  • Tried to force them to blaspheme.
  • Even began to pursue them to foreign cities.

Notice also his attitude toward them. In verse 9 he describes himself as hostile. Further he says of himself that he was, “furiously enraged” at them. The best description would be that he was out of control going around like a mad man or as might be said today a radical religious fundamentalist.

  1. Why was Paul so determine to destroy the followers of Christ?
  2. What would consider some of the worse of his actions?
  3. What do you think of the statement equating him to a radical religious fundamentalist?
  4. How could God hope to break through to such a person as Paul?
  5. How close to his conversion be to his question in verse 9?

Acts 26:12-15

Paul recounts the actual event surrounding his transformation. Unlike his testimony in Acts 22 he adds the words of Jesus, “It is hard for you to kick against the goad.” This was a practice used to train young oxen when they wear a yoke for the first time. Spikes were use to keep them from kicking. Jesus in essence was telling Paul that it was useless to continue to resist the call on his life. His opposition to Jesus would come to naught.

  1. In what ways is Paul’s testimony the same as has been previously presented in Acts 9 and 22?
  2. What does Paul now add?
  3. What was Jesus saying to him?
  4. In what ways do we resist the work that Jesus is trying to do in our own lives?
  5. Ultimately if we continue to rebel what action will Jesus take?
  6. In what ways is it best to do as Paul did and submit?

Acts 26:16-18

Paul continues to share new information that he had not presented before. Jesus immediately begins to give him instructions and spells out for him what will be his mission. He does not need to know everything that is going to take place for he would receive words from Jesus. The things Paul was going to do among both Jew and Gentile were:

  • To open their eyes.
  • To help them turn from the darkness to the light.
  • To turn them from the dominion of the devil to the kingdom of God.
  • That they would receive forgiveness of sins.
  • Finally to receive an inheritance alongside all the others who had already been sanctified.

 

  1. Why did Jesus immediately begin describe the mission He had for Paul even before he had been baptized?
  2. In what way did the things that Paul was to do describe his own needs?
  3. Which of these describe the steps you found yourself taking in coming to know Christ?
  4. In what way do you see this as the mission Christ has given you?

Acts 26:19

This is the key statement in Paul’s life. He had reached the point of decision. At this point in his life he received his freedom from the fury and rage that had led him to persecute Jesus. He had been set free from the law and traditions that had bound him.   Jesus had spelled out for him what is life if he followed Christ. It would mean leaving all that he had worked so hard to accomplish. From the way Paul made the statement before Agrippa there was no option. He believed with all of his heart that he had to be obedient to the call.

  1. What is wrapped up in Paul’s statement?
  2. What were Paul’s options?
  3. At what point in your life did you come to this point of decision?
  4. How close was your answer to the call of Christ like that of Paul?
  5. How could making this statement impact the ministry to which Christ has called you?

Acts 26:20

Paul then shares how he began to fulfill his new call by preaching in Damascus, the city where he had previously planned to take Christians as prisoner, and then in Jerusalem. He then worked to bring the Gentiles to the place of repentance so that they would turn to God.

  1. What do his actions tell us about Paul’s understanding of the words of Jesus?
  2. Why start preaching in Damascus?
  3. What does this say about the approach we should take in trying to reach the lost?
  4. What is to be our message to those who are lost?

Acts 26:21

It is interesting that Paul skips over much of the rest of the detail of his many years to service. With just a few words he speaks only of the seizure by the Jews and his appearance before King Agrippa and Festus. What he does once again is to proclaim why he is on trial. He only gave testimony of what the Prophets and Moses had prophesized about Jesus. The Scripture spoke of:

  • The suffering of Jesus.
  • His resurrection from the dead.
  • The fact that Jesus upon His resurrection was the first to share the good news of with both Jews and Gentiles.

 

  1. Why did Paul skip so much of what we consider important as we read the book of Acts?
  2. Why did Paul interject the prophets and Moses into his defense?
  3. Why does he once again explain why he was on trial?
  4. In what way did Jesus proclaim the good news to both Jews and Gentiles?
  5. What does the fact that he was brief in his comments say about the way we are to present our own testimony?

Acts 26:24

Festus interrupted Paul in the middle of his defense. He believed that Paul had lost his mind. Not only that but he thought that his learning had turned him into a mad man. Festus is a good example of the response that can be expected from one as humanistic as a Roman governor?

  1. What in Paul’s defense would warrant such an outburst from Festus?
  2. Why could Festus neither understand nor accept what Paul said?
  3. What can we expect from those wrapped up in the world’s system if we try to share either our testimony or what the Bible says?
  4. What one characteristic would you say might describe Festus at this point?

Acts 26:25

With all respect for the position of Festus, Paul made two valid points as he responded to Festus. Just because Paul had shared something beyond the understanding of the governor, it did not make him insane. He goes on to state that what it been said was the sober truth. As clearly as he could Paul had laid out in a very organized manner the events in his life that were vital to the understanding of why he was there before them. These were not the ranting of a mad man or one who or one who had lost control.

  1. How do you think Paul handled the outburst of Festus?
  2. What did Paul want to emphasize when he spoke of the sober truth?
  3. What evidence can we glean from what had gone on up to this point that Paul was neither “out of his mind” or been driven mad by his great learning?
  4. What example does Paul set for us in the way that we should deal with those who are critical of us?

Acts 26:26

Paul adds an additional piece of evidence to the truthfulness of his account. He addresses the king directly stating that he has all confidence that Agrippa was well aware of all that had been occurring in Israel during his reign.

Acts 26:27-28

The conversion is now turned around as Paul, moved from the role of prisoner and became the interrogator. Paul had responded to Festus as a one with authority and then asked King Agrippa a very pointed question. “Do you believe in the prophets?” It is almost a rhetorical question because he immediately affirms that the king does.

King Agrippa’s answer has puzzled commentators. There are a couple of different possibilities:

  • He may have felt that Paul was trying to back him into being on his side in the hearing. If he believed the prophet’s surely he would believe that Jesus was the Messiah.
  • He could not make such an important decision so quickly based on the little information he had heard from Paul.
  • Either way it was obvious that Agrippa was not going to become a Christian that day.

 

  1. In what way did Paul seem to become the one in control?
  2. In what position did his question to Agrippa put the king?
  3. Why would it have been difficult for the king to make a decision to follow Christ?

 

Acts 26:29

Paul did not let the people gathered there off the hook. There was a stark difference between Paul and all of the others. They were prisoners of Satan with no outward sign of their situation. He on the other hand may have been in chains but was free in Jesus Christ.   That is the reason he said his desire was that they, “might all become such as I am, except for these chains.”

  1. What was the difference between Paul and all the others at the hearing?
  2. In what ways were they more of a prisoner than he?
  3. What indicated he had a deep concern for the people?
  4. Why would care anything about those who wanted to keep him imprisoned?
  5. What is your response to those who are critical of you?
  6. What should our approach be to those who in authority over us?

Acts 26:30-32

The officials found themselves in a dilemma. They still did not have anything to write to Caesar. They concluded that there was no evidence to warrant a hearing in Rome. The only reason for sending Paul to Rome was because he had appealed to Caesar.

  1. Why did the officials find themselves in a quandary?
  2. What evidence did they find to condemn Paul?
  3. Why did they have to send him to Rome?

You

  • Consider this week those areas in your life that hinder you from accomplishing all that God has called you to do.
  • Pray that God will free you from those things that hold you in their power.
  • Look at the ways that you might respond as Paul did when he said, “I did not prove disobedient to the heavenly vision.” Acts 26:19
  • Search your heart to see how you would answer those that might question you.
  • Work to face criticism in a Christ-like manner.

As a church we can learn some important lessons from these chapters. We must always be faithful to the vision God has given to us. This may take some rediscovery because sometimes we get off track. Hopefully, with our new leadership model we can discover those ministries that are important to help make the church healthy once again. Secondly, we must free ourselves from those things that might hinder us from accomplishing the vision. Each of us may have different ideas of what those issues might be but working together in prayer we can change the direction of the church.

Additional Notes:

RT-What a power scene is presented to us Festus decides to bring Paul before King Agrippa. They arrive with all of the pomp and circumstances that would be expected upon the arrival of a king. Paul however was brought into the auditorium in his prison clothes wearing chains. On the surface, who would you think was on trial? Appearances can be quite deceiving. In fact Paul as a prisoner was a free man while the king and governor and all others there were captive of their sinful life. Paul had the answers to life. All they had were questions. (Acts 25:23-26:32)

RT-Paul asked a simple question of Festus and King Agrippa that begins with “Why.” He said, “Why is it considered incredible among you people if God does raise the dead?” The answer to that question is twofold.

  1. They chose not to believe because of their desire to maintain their hopeless status quo lifestyle.
  2. More importantly it indicated that the lacked that God could accomplish what for man seemed impossible. Their concept of God was way too small.

Is there is a possibility that there is another answer that would be closely related to the first one? They would have no problem with a person being raised from the dead as long as it was not Jesus. Why would this affect their answer? They knew as we know that to believe that God raised Jesus that He would be calling them to a much too high a standard of living for them to accept Him as Savior and Lord of their lives. (Acts 26:8)

DM-As he recounted his conversion experience Paul said it was his idea to, “be hostile” to followers of the Way. (Acts 26:9)

RT-Jesus spoke to Paul, not in deep theological terms, but in the everyday language of the people. Christ wanted to leave no doubt in his mind that he was being called to serve the risen Lord. (Acts 26:14)

GC-The following attributes present the opportunities to identify with Christ.

  1. As witness we are to open eyes to truth
  2. To turn people from darkness to light
  3. To turn people from dominion of Satan to God
  4. To help others to understand how they can receive the forgiveness of sins
  5. That they may receive an inheritance among those who have been sanctified by faith in Jesus. (Acts 26:18)

GC-Like Paul we are to be faithful when called out to carry out God’s purpose for our lives. (Acts 26:19)

DM-Paul did not disobey what he had witnessed in the heavenly vision on the Damascus Road. He began to share that experience with everyone with whom he came in contact that they should, “repent and turn to God.” (Acts 26:20)

GC-When given the opportunity the believer is to call the unbeliever to

  1. Repent of his sins
  2. Turn to God with his whole being

(Acts 26:20)

RT-It was said of Paul, “Your great learning has made you mad.” As we listen to his answer we see where the true learning takes place. It can only occur as one sits at the feet of Jesus.

Those of Paul’s day could not accept this truth so they claimed he was insane, yet it was the knowledge that they had acquired that was leading them down the road to an everlasting destruction. (Acts 26:24)

GC-In every situation the follower of Christ is to speak the truth. (Acts 26:25)

DM-Agrippa was brought to point of decision but declined to become a follower of Christ. (Acts 26:28)

OC-Paul stood before governors and kings espousing the truth. Some afraid of him others called him mad. They kept him in chains but he was the only true man among them. (Acts 26:23-29)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What To Do With Paul Acts 25

Filed under: Acts — admin @ 3:56 PM

Lesson 41

What To Do With Paul?

Acts 25

I am sure that I have caused others to ask, “What are we going to do with you?” For people who do not want to fit into a box the world just does not know how to handle them. Ever since I was much younger I have been one who wants to know why something has to be done in a certain way. If I do not see the logic in the answer I keep asking until it becomes clear to me what is going on. I call this attitude one of Aggressive/Patience. This has sometimes gotten me into hot water. It also has put me at odds with others at times. For years at the International Mission Board I struggled with the concept of what a Purchasing Department should be like. In my mind the organization never did appreciate or utilize that office the way it should. Some of the ideas that I presented a number of years ago have come to fruition. Even though I am no longer there, I am glad that management finally saw some value in the things for which I fought for so many years.

Sometimes in the church we do not do a good job in dealing with people with whom we may not totally agree. No matter how many members are in a church, a few or many, church there many differences of opinion based on age, likes, dislikes, level of spiritual maturity etc. Quite often we have not done a good job of assimilating all of those various components into a body who live and work in one accord. I am afraid that there are times when we are unwilling to listen to those who ask the question, why are we doing it this way? Rather than looking at the possibilities that that question may present our answer all too often is we have always done it that way.

Paul and the early church presented a dilemma to a group who did not want to change. Rather than saying maybe this new group has something to say the Jewish leaders rejected the Church and set up the conflict that continues into today’s lesson.

Acts 25:1-3

Festus the new governor wasted no time in going up and meeting with the Jewish officials. Knowing the history of Jews he would want to build a working relationship with them. By doing so, he would hope that he could maintain peace. He had only been in the Caesarea about three days before making the 80 mile trip up to Jerusalem.

There is little known about Festus. He only remained governor for two years before passing away. What little is known would indicate that he was well respected and a just man.

Of course the Jews used this opportunity to bring charges against Paul. They sought to have him returned to Jerusalem where they could arrange to set up an ambush and have him killed.

  1. Why would the governor make the trip to Jerusalem?
  2. In what ways was their treatment of the new governor unfair?
  3. In what ways will we show fairness in working with the new leadership at Bethany Place?
  4. Why did the Jewish leaders bring up the charges against Paul with Festus?
  5. What were their plans if the governor had agreed to do what they requested?

Acts 25:4-5

Their request was not granted. Instead Festus offered them the opportunity to go with them back to Caesarea. There he would hear allow them a fair hearing. At that time Paul would most likely be given an opportunity to speak.

  1. Why did Festus deny their request?
  2. Why was the opportunity given them to go with him a wise decision?
  3. Why was it important for Festus to hear Paul’s side of the story?
  4. Why did the Jews not want this to happen?
  5. How is time sometimes the best ally before having to make a decision?

Acts 25:6-7

True to his word Festus returned to Caesarea after 8 to 10 days in Jerusalem. Upon arriving he called the official court, the tribunal, into session to allow both the Jews and Paul to state their case. Paul was brought before the tribunal and the Jews immediately began as Luke writes, “to bring many and serious charges against him.” He further writes that they had no proof of any of them.

  1. Why did Festus call into session a formal inquiry?
  2. Why did he make sure that Paul was present to hear the charges?
  3. What was the problem with what the Jews were saying?
  4. In what ways do we sometimes act the manner of the Jews?

Acts 25:8

From Paul’s response we are able to glean what the charges against him were. As William Barclay the Jews were accusing him of:

  • Heresy – Committing acts against the Law
  • Sacrilege – Committing offenses against the Temple
  • Sedition – Committing offenses against Caesar.

In his defense Paul indicated his innocence of all three charges.

  1. Which of these had the Jews accused him before?
  2. Which one was a new one?
  3. Why did the Jews take a different tact this time?
  4. What do you think of Paul’s defense? How effective was it?

Acts 25:9-11

Festus tried to reach a compromise between the two parties. On the one hand he did not want to offend the Jews after being a governor for a few days. On the other hand he wanted to make sure that justice was served. It appears that he believed the only way to settle the matter was to have a full blown trial in Jerusalem, which would more than satisfy the Jews and play into their hands. This would give them the opportunity to carry out their plot against Paul.

Paul understood the situation and knew that he could never receive a fair trial under those circumstances. His only recourse was to appeal to Caesar, which was his right as a Roman citizen. His last claim of innocence may have been more for the Jews than for Festus.   Paul was so sure that when given a fair trial that he would be proved not guilty. He was even willing to stake his life on it.

  1. Why did Festus suggest a trial in Jerusalem before the Sanhedrin and himself?
  2. What is the likelihood that this trial would have ever taken place?
  3. What had the Jews planned from the very beginning?
  4. Why did Paul appeal to Caesar?
  5. How much of a gamble was this for Paul?
  6. Which of the charges would be dropped in a Roman hearing at this point?

Acts 25: 12

In a way Paul’s request relieved the pressure off of Festus.   He met with his own council and decided that Paul would go before Caesar with his appeal. It also presented him with a dilemma which will be seen in the next section of verses.

  1. What did Festus gain by granting Paul’s request?
  2. In what position did this now put the Jews?
  3. In all likelihood who would be present at the trial in Rome?

Acts 25:13-21

King Agrippa who was king of Galilee and Peraea came to Caesarea along with his sister, Bernice to pay a courtesy call to Festus. Since Agrippa was in power at the discretion of the Roman government it was expedient for him to welcome the new governor. Knowing that he was familiar with the Jewish religion Festus began to recount the events concerning Paul. By his conversation it was clear that he had no real reason to send Paul to Rome except the fact that Paul had made the request. If anyone could help him understand the situation it would be someone like the king.

It was obvious that Paul had broken no Roman law because Festus even said that his accusers, “were bringing charges not of such crimes as I was expecting but they simply had some points of disagreement with him about their own religion and about a dead man, Jesus whom Paul asserted to be alive.”

It was at that point that the decision was made for Paul to go to Rome. He had refused to return to Jerusalem even though the trial would be before the Roman governor.

  1. Why did King Agrippa travel to Caesarea to see Festus?
  2. Why did Festus begin sharing the situation he faced with the king?
  3. What about his conversation would indicate that Festus did truly believe that Paul needed to go to Rome?
  4. What does this conversation show about the character of Festus?

Acts 25:22

Agrippa shared with Festus that he too would like to hear what Paul had to say. Festus was in agreement with him meeting Paul face to face.

  1. Why would Agrippa want to hear what Paul had to say?
  2. What could that meeting add to what Festus had already shared?
  3. Why was Festus so willing to make arrangements for Agrippa to meet Paul?

You-

  • Be considerate of the feelings and ideas of others.
  • Pray that God will help you appreciate the diversity of people He has brought into the Church.
  • Search the Scriptures to see all the different types of personalities God used to carry out His purpose for the world.
  • Pray that you will be in a position to counteract any falsehoods you hear being presented.
  • Meditate and Study God’s word so that you will know the difference between truth and falsehood.
  • Know when in the course of events when you need to appeal to a higher authority for answers.

We in the Church are involved in an ongoing balancing act of living in the world but not being a part of it. Constantly we face issues that seem to be the truth. Our responsibility is to always view these in light of what the Scripture has to say. Even in the decisions made within the Church there is a way that seems right to man and may be good in the sight of the world but is not the best for the church.

There are those who like the Sanhedrin who will cloud the issues with half-truths or outright lies. If we are not careful we will find ourselves in the position of the commander, Felix and then Festus who do not know what should be the next course of action. Let us be like Paul who, although seen as a troublemaker, was steadfast in believing that he had done no wrong. He was so sure that he would be vindicated if only given a fair hearing.

Let us be willing to put our prejudices and agendas aside in order to listen to the opinions. There may be among us some who are constantly calling us to take a new direction. Unless we are open to hearing diverse ideas we may not realize that he or she could be sharing God’s purpose for our church in order to be only mission with Him.

Additional Notes:

C-After Festus became governor the Jews made one more attempt to have Paul condemned by bringing the same old accusations before Festus as they had with Felix. Not knowing all of the circumstances he agreed to give them a hearing once he went back to Caesarea. (Acts 25:1-5)

C-Upon his return to Caesarea Festus set up a hearing for Paul. During the trial the Jews presented their charges which could not be proven. A new twist entered into the drama when Festus asked Paul if he would be willing to go to Jerusalem. He refused and made an appeal to Caesar. Festus had no choice but to grant Paul’s request. (Acts 25:6-12)

DM-Whenever a person with an ulterior motive like Herod, Pilate and in this case Festus seek to please a group such as the Jews someone else will suffer the consequences, Paul had to appeal to Caesar to keep from returning to Jerusalem. (Acts 25:9-12)

 

 

Challenging the Evidence Acts 24

Filed under: Acts — admin @ 3:51 PM

Lesson 40

Challenging the Evidence

Acts 24

I know that most of you have played the game of gossip where one person shares with the next person and so forth until the message reaches the last person. Usually what comes out at the end never resembles what the first person said. I have to admit that I have been guilty of this in real life. Sometimes it happens because I haven’t listened as closely as I should and only hear part of the conversation. There have been other times however I have gleaned only what I wanted to know. Then when it comes time to share with others what I know the end results do not resemble the facts at all. I have to be careful that I make sure that the story I present is true. One other danger that I face is to take great care when I teach God’s word that what is taught is according to the truth found therein.

We as church members can be guilty of this kind of gossip. Whenever we hear someone say something it is sometimes our tendency to spread the information without verifying the facts. All of us can remember instances when this may have occurred. The damage it can cause can be irreversible. It reaches a point that the victim of such gossip is guilty as presumed and not given an opportunity to defend himself. Paul continues to face this dilemma in today’s lesson.

Acts 24:1

Based on what the commander had told Felix, the Jews finally sent a delegation down to Caesarea who arrived after five days. It was composed of Annas, the high priest, some elders and a lawyer named Tertullus. One can only assume that because the inquiry had moved into the Roman justice system that the Jews felt they needed some legal representation. Of course this only muddied the waters because at this point this would mean that their lawyer would be three levels from the actual participants in the riot.

  1. Why would it take the delegation five days to get to Caesarea?
  2. Who were the representatives that came?
  3. Why did they bring a lawyer with them?
  4. Who was missing from this group?
  5. Why would any presentation of the facts be dubious at best?
  6. What happens in our lives and the life of the church the further each person is removed from the actual events?
  7. What is the real danger when this occurs?

 

Acts 24:2-4

When Paul was brought into the inquiry the Jewish lawyer seized the floor. He began by trying to flatter Felix. He shared how the Jewish people had benefited so much while Felix had been governor. After these opening remarks he was finally ready to present the accusations that the religious leaders want to make about Paul.

  1. Why did the lawyer seize the floor?
  2. What did he hope to gain by his opening remarks?
  3. How did what he said differ from the way that the Jews felt about all Romans?
  4. Why did Tertullus do what he said he did not want to do?
  5. What did his words have to do with the reasons they were there?
  6. In what ways do we delay dealing with issues that confront us?

Acts 24:5-6

It is interesting that he make accusations that had nothing to do with breaking the law. They all dealt with religious struggles that the Jews had with all people. Remember last week that Paul unearthed the division even with their own ranks. There was not one said by Tertullus that could justify why Paul had been placed under arrest by the Roman army. Look at the claims made against him. He was:

  • A pest
  • One who stirs up dissension among Jews everywhere
  • A ring leader among Christians
  • One who tried to desecrate the temple.

At this point his words become interesting. He said they, the Jews arrested him. Of course this was absolutely false. The mob was trying to kill him without trial without the presence, as far as the Scripture tells us of the religious leaders. According to what the lawyer said, “We wanted to judge him according to our own Law.” Luke has already shown what this justice would look like as done by these law abiding citizens.

  1. Which of the accusations made were true?
  2. Which of them would have justified Paul being brought before a Roman governor?
  3. Which parts of the statement by Tertullus were false or blatant twisting of the facts?
  4. In what ways can we sometimes distort the facts to accomplish our own agenda?
  5. What do the actions of the Jewish leaders and the employing of Tertullus say about the way the men practiced the Jewish religion?
  6. How do you think God feels about this kind of activity under the guise of religion?

Acts 24:7-8a

The lawyer now turned to accusing the commander of preventing the carrying out of justice by use of force. The commander then insisted that the accusers appear before Felix.

  1. Why did the lawyer claim that the commander had prevented the Jews from carrying out judgment as they saw it?
  2. What had the commander really accomplished?
  3. What had the commander accomplished by having the accusers appear before Felix?

Acts 24:8-9

The stage is now set for Paul to speak. Before he finishing however Tertullus tries to set Paul to condemn himself expecting him to admit that all of the accusations are true. The Jews also continued their attacks on him. As the far the Jews were concerned he was guilty before he had an opportunity to prove his innocence.

  1. Why did Tertullus make his final argument with the particular way he spoke?
  2. In what ways did this make it more difficult for Paul to defend himself?
  3. What did the Jews hope to accomplish with their antics?
  4. In what ways can we put people in similar positions?

Acts 24:10

Paul’s opening remarks were short and to the point. He thanked Felix for the opportunity to defend himself.

Acts 24:11-13

In contrast to the Jews and Tertullus Paul, when given a chance to speak, Paul laid out for Felix a clear and concise sequence of the events that had taken place in Jerusalem. Most of these facts would have been unknown to his accusers.

He broke his defense down into three thoughts. He first dealt with what had occurred in Jerusalem. With a complete knowledge of the events he knew that the accusations could not be proven by the Jews who were present.

  1. Why did Paul repeat the events that had occurred up to the time of his arrest?
  2. What knowledge did he have that the Jews knew nothing about?
  3. Why could the Jews not proved the accusations?

 

Acts 24:14-15

He then moved to the underlying reason that he was on trial. He agreed with the Jews concerning one of their claims. He served God as a member of the sect they called the Way. Using the opportunity he once again shared that both he and the Jews believed the Scriptures which spoke of the hope of the resurrection from the dead. Paul lastly spoke of the guiding principle of his life. This was the same one to which he held before and after his conversion. His desire was, “to do his best to maintain always a blameless conscience both before God before men.”

  1. In what ways is this testimony than what we have seen before?
  2. What was the common thread?
  3. Why would the Jews there have trouble accepting what Paul was saying?
  4. What was Paul’s guiding principle for life?
  5. How would such a principle benefit us in our walk as followers of Christ?

Acts 24:16-18a

After giving his short testimony Paul returned to what had brought him to Jerusalem and what occurred during his most reason visit. He had come to bring the gifts made by the churches in Greece and Macedonia and to present offerings. Finally, not only had he provided a service to his people but his actions in the temple were done according to obedience to the law of purification. Taking all of the factors into view Paul was correct in declaring his innocence.

  1. Why did Paul repeat part of his testimony that he had given before?
  2. What were the reasons that he had returned to Jerusalem?
  3. What last piece of convincing evidence did he present to prove his innocence?

Acts 24:18-21

For his closing arguments Paul sets out to discredit the men who had come down to Caesarea as unqualified prosecutors. He begins by stating the only qualify individuals would have been the Asia Jews that made the charges against him. Of course they were nowhere to be found. Then he spoke of his statements before the Sanhedrin concerning the resurrection of the dead. They had found nothing wrong with that remark and were even divided among themselves as to his guilt.

  1. How was Paul able to discredit the Jews who had come to Caesarea?
  2. Who would have been the only ones who could have brought charges against him before Felix?
  3. Why did Paul believe that his appearance before the Sanhedrin had proven his innocence?

Acts 24:22-23

It came time for Felix to render his decision. Much to the consternation of the Jews he postponed judgment until the commander, Claudius Lysias, could come to Caesarea to give his version of the events. It is interesting that Luke tells us that Felix, “Having a more exact knowledge of the Way, put them off.” Evidently he had witnessed the behavior of the followers of Christ and was convinced that if Paul was one of the leaders of the sect that the accusations of the Jews were not true.

He however did detain Paul but gave him the freedom to receive friends. His detention would have pleased the Jews possibly giving them an opportunity to press their case forward. Felix would also have benefited because with Paul in custody there would be less of a possibility of more events like the one which had just occurred.

  1. Why did Felix issue a final judgment on Paul?
  2. In what way would this have upset the Jews?
  3. What part did the statement, “having a more exact knowledge of the way,” have in his decision?
  4. What would that knowledge imply?
  5. Who benefited from Paul detention?
  6. Why was this true?
  7. How does this response from a pagan say about the way we can impact the world as followers of Christ?

Acts 24:24-27

During the next two years of Paul’s life there appears to have been a great deal of interaction between Paul and Felix. The first indication is a discussion that they had about, “faith in Christ Jesus.” When the discussion turned to “righteousness, self-control and the judgment to come,” Felix became frightened and ended the conversation by sending Paul away. Paul was talking about the high standards of the Christian to a man who was immoral and self-serving. Felix seduced Drusilla who was the wife of another man by magic and married her. He then took sides with the Greeks in a violent dispute they had with the Jews allowing his soldiers to kill several thousand Jews and ransacking the homes of some of the most wealthy Jews. No wonder he was scared at the words of Paul.

Another thing that he did according to Luke was to obtain money from Paul. This sounds a lot like a bribe. These meetings happened frequently over the two years as he conversed with Paul.

All of this ended when Felix was removed as governor for the above mentioned reasons. Rather than allowing him to go free he left Paul in prison as a favor to the Jews.

  1. Why would Felix want to carry on a conversation with Paul?
  2. Why was he frightened by the discussion of righteousness, self-control and judgment?
  3. How did Paul’s life compare with that of Felix?
  4. Which of the two men was the true prisoner? Explain
  5. Why did Felix seek to receive money from Paul?
  6. If Paul had succumbed to this temptation to take the easy way out what would it have done to his witness?

What would draw the lost to hear what you would have to say? C-When the Jews, minus those from Asia, went down to Felix they brought a lawyer to present their case against Paul. In spite of all the false accusations made, Paul was able to defend himself quite convincingly. Felix did not turn him over to the Jews but kept him in Caesarea purportedly until the commander, Lysias, could come down and share his side of the story. (Acts 24:1-2, 10)

You-

  1. Consider times when you have found yourself in a situation that may have required you to be in the position of:
  • Paul
  • Felix
  • Jews
  • Tertullus

How much have you been like each one of them?

  1. Take care that in any situation that you have all of the facts and not base what you do on information from a third party.
  2. Always being willing to stand up for the truth in every circumstance.

We may find ourselves in the position of Paul at some point. Fortunately most of us have not been accused of hurting the church by our actions. To make sure that this does not happen we are to be careful of participating in gossip or rumors about anyone. Paul was on trial because of a number statements that were not true. In order for us to always live together as a church family we must always allow those involved in a conflict to resolve it. Only when two many parties begin interfering do things get blown out of proportion. Let us believe the best about everyone and many of our problems will disappear. Christ does want to live in one accord.

GC-A Christian of godly character;

  1. Serves God
  2. Believes the written word (The entire Counsel of God)
  3. Hopes in God
  4. Believes in the resurrection

(Acts 24:14-15, 21; 26:6, 22-23)

GC-It is critical that a believer maintains a blameless conscience before God and man.     (Acts 24:16)

RT-Paul believe that the Law and the prophets clearly spelled out for him the assurance of the resurrection which he followed all of his heart. (Acts 24:14-16)

DM-Felix chose to reject the truth of Jesus Christ as spoken to him by Paul. His fear of the consequences of his decision was not strong enough to make him become a follower of Christ. (Acts 24:24-26)

RT-The turning point for Felix and Drusilla came when Paul spoke to them about faith in Christ Jesus. Felix became frightened and sent him away as Paul spoke of righteousness, self-control and the judgment to come. (Acts 24:24-25)

C-Being held as a prisoner for two years had to be difficult for one so use to the freedom to travel throughout the Roman Empire, witnessing everywhere he went. After two years of being in jail Felix was replaced by Festus. He, hoping to please the Jews, left Paul there. (Acts 24:27)

 

Additional Notes:

C-When the Jews, minus those from Asia, went down to Felix they brought a lawyer to present their case against Paul. In spite of all the false accusations made, Paul was able to defend himself quite convincingly. Felix did not turn him over to the Jews but kept him in Caesarea purportedly until the commander, Lysias, could come down and share his side of the story. (Acts 24:1-2, 10)

GC-A Christian of godly character;

  1. Serves God
  2. Believes the written word (The entire Counsel of God)
  3. Hopes in God
  4. Believes in the resurrection

(Acts 24:14-15, 21; 26:6, 22-23)

GC-It is critical that a believer maintains a blameless conscience before God and man.     (Acts 24:16)

RT-Paul believe that the Law and the prophets clearly spelled out for him the assurance of the resurrection which he followed all of his heart. (Acts 24:14-16)

DM-Felix chose to reject the truth of Jesus Christ as spoken to him by Paul. His fear of the consequences of his decision was not strong enough to make him become a follower of Christ. (Acts 24:24-26)

RT-The turning point for Felix and Drusilla came when Paul spoke to them about faith in Christ Jesus. Felix became frightened and sent him away as Paul spoke of righteousness, self-control and the judgment to come. (Acts 24:24-25)

C-Being held as a prisoner for two years had to be difficult for one so use to the freedom to travel throughout the Roman empire, witnessing everywhere he went. After two years of being in jail Felix was replaced by Festus. He, hoping to please the Jews, left Paul there. (Acts 24:27)

 

 

 

 

 

Paul Before the Religious Leaders Acts 22:30 – 23:35

Filed under: Acts — admin @ 3:47 PM

Lesson 39

Paul before the Religious Leaders

Acts 22:30-23:35

One of the things that I have learned over the years that I have been teaching is to try and understand your audience. If it is a group with which I meet on a consistent basis I have tried to get to know them by having fellowship times and listening to the needs that are present in their lives.

It is not always possible to have an opportunity to build relationships. One thing that will help in communicating is to have an affinity with people on the subject being shared either by teaching or speaking. Body language will often indicate whether the group is with you and taking actual part in what is being shared. Heads resting on chests is not a good sign. Heads nodding in agreement is what you hope to achieve.

I am still learning how to present material in such a way that I am not just presenting facts but speaking in such a way that what I am saying is having an impact on the lives of the listener. I read somewhere that teaching and learning come from the same root word. In other words if a person is not grasping what is being taught then teaching is not taking place.

Although some of us will never stand before a group of people, it is important to begin to know the people who attend the Bible Study and/or Worship Service. Each and every one of them and we have needs in our lives. It may be that a handshake will fulfill what a person needs on a given Sunday. There may be more deep seated needs that are going on. We have opportunities each and every Sunday to make people feel welcome. Look around and see what seems to be the atmosphere of the gathering. Does it seem that the Holy Spirit is truly moving in the times together? If so we can be assured that the message of God’s good news is reaching down into the hearts of people.

Paul in this morning’s lesson was alert to the climate in which he found himself. We need to do the same and to respond accordingly. This chapter will be a continuation of the different ways that Paul defends himself in different settings.

Acts 22:30

It was for the benefit of the Commander to find out why there had been such a violent reaction to the presence of Paul in the city. He could not allow such unrest to continue. Unless he could resolve the issue peaceably he would find himself in trouble with his superiors. In order to determine what had happened he brought all the parties in the conflict together.

Acts 23:1-2

It was obvious from Paul’s opening remarks that he would never get a fair hearing from the Sanhedrin. After addressing those assembled as the “council and brethren” he made the claim that he was innocent before God. This brought immediate reaction from Ananias the high priest who considered Paul’s statements arrogant and an affront to the leaders sitting there. He had someone slap Paul on the mouth to shut him up before he was able to give a defense. Paul was indeed equal with these men because he had once been a part of the religious establishment as a Pharisee. By having Paul slapped Ananias violated the law because an Israelite was not to be slapped across the face.

  1. Why was it impossible for Paul to get a fair hearing from the Sanhedrin?
  2. Why did Ananias have Paul slapped?
  3. In what way were Paul’s statements accurate? (See Philippians 3:4-6)
  4. How did Ananias deny Paul’s rights by his actions?

Acts 23:3-5

Ananias’ action made Paul angry. He pronounced God’s judgment on him and use the term “whitewashed wall” describe him. Remember Jesus used this same analogy in describing the religious leaders back in Matthew 23:27. It referred to the practice of whitewashing tombs so that a person would not become defiled by touching them. Jesus called those who did this as those who were hypocrites. Paul was basically saying your actions which are against the law are louder than the pious words you speak. Whether sarcastically or sincerely he responded to the one who mentioned that Ananias was high priest by indicating he did not know he was the high priest and he knew it was not right to speak against a leader of the people.

  1. Why did Paul get angry?
  2. What did he declare about Ananias?
  3. What justification did he have for his anger and his statements?
  4. What do you think of his response to the one who informed him that Ananias was high priest?
  5. What are instances in your life when you felt justified in speaking out as Paul did?
  6. In what ways can you recognize a person who is hypocritical?
  7. What is basis upon which you make that distinction?

Acts 23:6-9

Paul quickly determined that there were both Pharisees and Sadducees in attendance. Even after the previous incident he again addressed them as “Brethren.” This time however he included the declaration, “I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee.” Then he said, “I am on trial for the hope and resurrection of the dead.” These statements elicited the expected results from the group, since both parties would respond according to their beliefs. Those beliefs were for the Sadducees:

  • Belief in only the written law
  • Did not believe in angels and spirits
  • Belief in free will
  • Did not believe in any type of resurrection

It also could be said about them that they were the party in who collaborated with the Romans and were in power because of that relationship.

The Pharisees on the other hand believed in:

  • Strict adherence to both the written and oral law
  • Angels and spirits
  • Predestination
  • A resurrection of the dead.

This conflict of two different doctrines brought about a great dissension and division as some began to side with Paul while others maintained his guilt. With so much conflict taking place in their own ranks how it the world could they condemn Paul.

  1. How was Paul able to perceive that members of both religious parties were there?
  2. What different dynamics did his statement about being a Pharisee bring to the proceedings?
  3. Why would he interject this fact?
  4. What did Paul say and not say with his statement about the resurrection?
  5. What did the dissension that arose tell us about the Jewish religion?
  6. What can we glean from this incident?
  7. How does all of this compare with what has been seen of the church?

Acts 23:10

As he witnessed the bedlam that occurred, the commander went in and rescued Paul. He was afraid they might cause him physical harm. Although not mentioned here this whole episode certainly did not answer any of the concerns of the commander. Further, we can only imagine the effect it may have had on his view of religion and Judaism in particular.

  1. Why did the commander sense that he needed to rescue Paul?
  2. In what ways do you think that this whole episode might impact the commander and those under his command?
  3. How did the actions of the Jews reflect what can occur within the walls of the church today?
  4. In what ways can the church today be a poor witness for what we are suppose to believe?

Acts 23:11

After experiencing all that had occurred during those two days Paul was probably demoralized. He had to wonder if his work was through. To encourage him the Lord came to him and indicated that God was not through with him yet and that he would have the opportunity to witness of Christ’s cause in Rome.

  1. What would be your mindset if you had experienced all that Paul had in those two days?
  2. Why did Christ appear to him at that particular time?
  3. What were the important words that Paul needed to hear?
  4. In what ways have you received encouragement when you felt that you were no longer had anything to offer in the way of service?
  5. Why is it important that you sense that Christ is right beside you in difficult times?
  6. When is your work complete?

Acts 23:12-22

The timing could not have been better for the appearance of Christ. Paul had a long way to go before reaching Rome. His troubles in Jerusalem were not over by any means. The Jews had not given up on trying to kill Paul. A new plan was devised by forty Jews. They made a vow that they would not eat or drink until they had eliminated him. Their plan was to lie in wait as the leaders asked that Paul be brought before them for further examination. Fortunately Paul’s nephew heard the plan and reported it to Paul who called to a centurion to carry the lad to the commander. The commander then took the young man to one side and asked him what he had to report. After sharing what the Jews intended to do the commander told him not to tell anyone that he had come forth with the information.

  1. What was the next plan that the Jews put in place to eliminate Paul?
  2. Why did they continue to desire to have Paul killed?
  3. How did this reflect on the Jewish religion?
  4. What happened that thwarted the plan of the Jews?
  5. Why was the commander willing to believe the word of the young lad?
  6. What is our attitude at times when a young person shares what he or she has heard?

Acts 23:23-24

At this point the commander concluded that he could not get to the bottom of what was going on in such a volatile environment. He therefore made immediate plans to have Paul safely transported to Caesarea in the middle of the night.

  1. Why did the Commander conclude the best option was to send Paul to Caesarea?
  2. What did it say about the commander’s view of the whole situation?
  3. What had the Commander gained with all of his efforts to find out why the Jews hated Paul so much?
  4. In what circumstances is it good for us to take a step back and re-evaluate the circumstances in which we find ourselves?

Acts 23:25-30

The commander is now named by Luke. In his letter to Felix the governor he identifies himself as Caudius Lysias. It would be foolish on his part to send Paul to Caesarea without giving a clear explanation of the events that had taken place. The key to the whole letter was his efforts to find out the cause of the commotion. He had at least figured out that it was “over questions about their Law.” He also determined that he did not see the accusations against Paul “deserving of death or imprisonment.” The final part of the letter indicated that he would have the Jewish leaders go down to Caesarea to present their case.

  1. Why did the commander deem it necessary to send a letter to Felix with Paul?
  2. What did the content of the letter show about what he understood was going on?
  3. What was the main reason for sending Paul to Felix?
  4. In what ways was this a wise decision on his part?

Acts 23:31-34

In ways the delivery of Paul to Felix may seem anti-climatic. He was brought to Caesarea where he and the letter from Claudius Lysias were turned over to Felix. After reading the letter and discovering that Paul was from Cilicia he promised him a hearing once the Jews arrived. The purpose of these verses was to show that God’s promise to Paul was beginning to be fulfilled as he was now in the hands of the Roman authorities. This was the first step in his journey to Rome.

You-

  1. Think about how you have reacted to certain situations in the past. Have your actions and words been ones that would please God.
  2. Learn to understand and appreciate those around you who will have different personalities and ideas than you.
  3. Always think before speaking that your words will be suited to the situation.
  4. Grow in your knowledge of God through His word that you may live in one accord with others.

We do play a role in what others think about the church. At the end of the day the Commander in incident had no more idea of what the confusion was all about than when he rescued Paul the first time. When we as a church are conflicted about what we believe how can we expect the world to gravitate towards the church? A church divided can only not stand but certainly it cannot influence the world for Christ. What we have been studying for almost a year is the way the church of the first century grew and dealt with problems within its ranks.

May we in the coming days take the lessons learned and apply them to our own situation. May we get to know the people within the body that we can live in one accord.

Additional Notes:

C-The real reason Paul had been persecuted time and again and now was standing trial among his pears was for “for the hope and resurrection of the dead.” If we truly think about this it is the very message that needs to be heard throughout the world, however wherever it has been proclaimed the church has always been persecuted and ridiculed. He was speaking of true life but they chose death. (Acts 23:6)

C-Paul’s statement brought about a division among his accusers. Some believed in the resurrection, the Pharisees, while others, Sadducees, denied anything of a supernatural nature. When his life became endangered the Roman contingent had to rescue him because he was not caught in the middle of the uproar. (Acts 23:7-10)

S-The Lord appeared to Paul and indicated he would go to Rome as His witness. (Acts 23:11)

C-After a plot against his life was discovered Paul was moved very quickly under the cover of darkness to Caesarea where he was turned over to the Roman governor Felix. (Acts 23:12-33)

OC-Jerusalem was not a time of defeat for Paul but a provided a door opportunity to open for him to go to Rome, the capitol of the world at that time. (Acts 23:11)

RT-It is interesting that although Festus could find no reason to detain Paul, he decided to send him to Caesar anyway. He of course thought he was acting on his own, but he was just providing the means by which the words of the Lord would be fulfilled. Paul had already been told by the Lord that he was going to have the opportunity to preach in Rome. (Acts 23:11; 25:25, 27)

DM-The Jews planned to have Paul killed. (Acts 23:12-15, 21)

C-Paul was detained in Herod’s Praetorium until his accusers could come down from Jerusalem. At that point they would once again have an opportunity to present their case before not a Roman commander but Felix the governor of all of Judea. (Acts 23:25)

 

 

 

 

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress