Lesson 63
Trial Before Godless Men
Luke 23:1-32
At this moment I cannot remember a specific incident but I’m sure over the years I have looked for allies to build a case against someone. It is much easier to try to get someone on your side than to go to the person with whom you are having a problem and work it all according to Scripture. It is a pretty cowardly act to try to get someone else to do my dirty work. Sadly, in the eyes of man I might appear to be innocent when all the time I am the guilty party. I may be able to hide my guilt before man but God sees everything that I do.
I have learned, but do not always practice it as I should, to not get caught up in gossip. If I keep away from those who want to spread stories about others then I can honestly say that I do not know what some one is trying to say. The best offense in that case is to tell the individual that he or she needs to go to the person with which he has a problem and work it out. It is always best not to get into the middle of an issue. Someone is going to get hurt and it just might be me.
Too many churches have either split or suffered major damage to its reputation because the members participated in gossip. Ministers have been forced to resign when there are those in the body who decide he is not doing the job according to their criteria. The church has the ability to destroy reputations just through words. James was right when he wrote the “Tongue is a fire, the world of iniquity.” (James 3:6) Since the church is made up of individuals each with his or her own views, the problem of gossip is magnified. It is possible that an influential person could muster a large number of people to his or her perspective and cause tremendous damage to the spiritual life of the church.
All of us have seen this happened. What needs to take place is rather than division there be a unified spirit within the body. We need to begin looking for ways to come together to grow God’s kingdom rather than our own fiefdoms. Remember those who cause the greatest problems are those who have to have others to act as there agents. Most of the time there is no validity to the claims that are made.
Luke 23:1
Worldly men know how to overcome the obstacles in their paths. The Jewish religious leaders were no exception. In the last lesson they were left with the question of what to do with Jesus. He had given them the answer they had wanted to hear to prove His guilt when He said that He was the Son of God. At that point they came up with a brilliant plan which may have been in the works before the illegal trial of Jesus. They would take Him before Pilate the Roman governor for sentencing. This would of course would exonerate them completely before the people. They could could point to the fact that it was Pilate who had actually sentenced Him and carried out the execution of Jesus.
There was one problem remaining. What charges could they bring before Pilate. Surely for them to say that Jesus had admitted to being God would have caused him to chase them away from his presence. Since he did not believe in God in the first place what difference would it have made to him what Jesus called Himself. The only possibility for the Sanhedrin was to show there was evidence that Jesus would undermine the control the Romans had over Judea and possibly cause an uprising among the people. They above all could not tell the truth.
1
-
What problem faced the Sanhedrin?
-
Why did they have the problem in the first place? (They would not accept Jesus as the Messiah and were determined to have Him eliminated from the scene.)
-
Why would they need Pilate’s help?
-
What would be the one thing that Pilate cared about? (Peace in Judea. Any mention of rebellion might cause the Roman government to recall him.)
-
In what ways did their action reflect the way men handle problems today?
Luke 23:2
Their argument before Pilate was full of lies. They claimed first of all that Jesus had told people not to pay taxes. Secondly, He was accused of making Himself the Messiah and a king. Pilate dismissed the first charge and did not even address it as an issue. It is possible he had heard of Jesus’ conversation with the religious leaders when He told them to give to Caesar what belonged to him. His question to Jesus even ignored the idea of being the Jewish Messiah. He was only interested in the claims that would affect his ability to govern the people. His inquiry included a thought the Jews had not included. He wanted to know if Jesus was the “King of the Jews.” In a way that position would not be a threat to him but more so to Herod. Pilate was used to have puppet kings in power in Judea.
-
In what ways was the testimony of the Jews different than the charges made against Jesus at His trial?
-
Why did the Sanhedrin switch from accusing Jesus of blasphemy to one of insurrection?
-
Why did Pilate ignore the charges of failure to pay taxes? (It was not as important as the idea that a new king might try to rise and cause trouble for him.)
-
Why did he add “of the Jews” to his question about whether Jesus was king? (Kings of the Jews presented no particular problem for the Romans.)
-
What do those who start rumors have to fear?
Luke 23:4-5
It is obvious that Pilate recognized that the Sanhedrin had brought Jesus before him on bogus charges. He wanted to let Jesus go free, but was soon overwhelmed by the clamor from the Jews. When the previous accusations did not work for them they came up with a new ones which were true but were twisted to appear as something would mean trouble for the peace and tranquility of the city. Yes the things Jesus did such as healing did excite the people. It is also true that everywhere He went the people hung on every word. They were not words that would cause rebellion but love and compassion on hope for a people caught up in hopelessness. The religious leaders tried to twist what Jesus was doing into that which suited their own purposes of controlling those Jesus was freeing from bondage of the law and tradition. One of the things they said seemed to provide the opportunity for Pilate to pass the buck. They told him that Jesus had actually started preaching in Galilee.
-
Why was Pilate willing to free Jesus?
-
Why did the Jews continue with the ranting? (They were determined to see Jesus executed.)
-
In what ways did the leaders twist what Jesus was doing and giving it the appearance of evil?
-
How do we sometimes twist the truth to suit our own purposes? (Taking words out of context.)
-
What had Jesus ministry truly been about?
-
What are we to do in the face of false criticism and gossip?
-
How do we sometimes pass the buck when involved in a situation?
2
Luke 23:6-7
Pilate picked up on the word that Jesus was from Galilee. Galilee fell under the jurisdiction of Herod. Since it was the Passover Herod was in Jerusalem. Jesus was sent to Herod for judgment. As was mentioned above, it was a perfect opportunity for Pilate to avoid having to give the final verdict of whether Jesus would live or die. It also would keep him from further provoking the Jews with whom he had a very tenuous and volatile relationship because of some of his previous missteps.
-
Why was Pilate glad to hear that Jesus was from Galilee?
-
How did he see that fact as an escape from his dilemma?
-
Why was he so afraid to make a decision? (He would lose out with the people or the leaders which was the last thing he could not afford to have happen politically.)
-
What did he finally do? (Sent Jesus off to Herod.)
-
What are some of the ways you have tried to keep from making a tough decision?
-
What is the best approach to take when confronted with a difficult situation?
Luke 23:8-11
It is an amazing thing that for three and one half years Jesus had been teaching and performing miracles throughout Galilee and Herod had not availed himself of the opportunity to see Him not one time. Herod obviously was not among the people who he was supposing to be serving but had isolated himself and surrounded himself with those who would do his beckoning. Now away from the crowds Herod wanted his own private showing of the signs that Jesus could perform.
Jesus refused to participate in the sham masquerading as interest in the abilities of one claimed to be the Son of God. He did not respond to the questions thrown at Him or the continual barrage of accusations from the religious leaders, who may have thought they could get further with Herod than they had with Pilate. Since Jesus would not answer Herod could not condemn the man anymore than the Jews themselves. He was limited in the punishments he could carry out. Given the opportunity Herod and his men mocked Jesus put a purple robe on Him and sent Him back to Pilate.
-
What does Luke’s words say about Herod? (He had not taken the time nor was he inclined to get out among the people to whom Jesus was ministering.)
-
What does it say about his leadership?
-
What did he want Jesus to do for him? (Put on a side show to amuse him.)
-
What do you think of the way Jesus handled the situation?
-
What lesson can we learn from His actions?
-
Why did Herod send Jesus back to Pilate? (He could not find any reason to condemn Jesus.)
Luke 23:12
Herod and Pilate were in agreement. Jesus had done nothing to deserve death. Pilate saw in Herod an ally who given the opportunity did not undermine his leadership. For that reason two evil men became good friends from that point on.
-
About what were Herod and Pilate in agreement?
-
How could Herod have used the opportunity to disgrace Pilate?
-
In what ways were these two men alike? (Both evil, power hungry politicians.)
-
What sealed the friendship of those two men?
3
Luke 23:13-17
It was critical for Jesus to be returned to Pilate. His own words indicated that He would be turned over to the Gentiles. (See Matthew 20:10; Mark 10:33; Luke 18:32) Pilate turned the tables on the religious leaders accusing them of making false assertions against Jesus. He was in the mind of Pilate not guilty of inciting insurrection. Even Herod agree to the innocence of Jesus having sent Him back to Pilate. It was Pilate’s intention to have Him scourged and then released.
-
Was it important for Jesus to be sent back to Pilate? (Scripture is very clear that Jesus would be executed by Gentiles. Herod was a descendant of Abraham although not of Jacob, therefore he would be seen as a Jew.)
-
What positive characteristics do you see in Pilate at this point?
-
How did he turn the tables on the Jews?
-
What gave Pilate the confidence to free Jesus? (Herod was in agreement with Pilate.)
-
What attempt was he going to take to pacify the Jews? (Scourge Him.)
Luke 23:18-22
Nothing was to satisfy the Jews short of the death of Jesus. They began to use one of Pilate’s ploys against him. He had begun the practice of releasing one of the political prisoners held by the Romans. They began to cry out for Barabbas who had been arrested for insurrection and murder. It is clear they were backing the governor into a corner from which he would not be able to escape without giving in to their commands. The release of a prisoner was begun to appease the Jews after Pilate had killed a number of them indiscriminately.
Pilate continued to attempt to turn Jesus loose. He could not understand how much hatred was being exhibited towards a man who he knew to be innocent. Once again he promised to punish Jesus hoping that it would satisfy their thirst for blood.
-
What was the state of the minds of the Jews?
-
What had happened to them at that point? (They had taken on a mob mentality where all rational thinking no longer prevailed.)
-
What did Pilate try to show them? (That all of their accusations were false and Jesus did not deserve the punishment they sought.)
-
When have you been caught up in a situation that took on a mob mentality?
-
How can you keep from getting caught in such an evil practice?
Luke 23:23-25
The voices raised in opposition became too strong for Pilate. He finally saw that the situation was getting out of hand and a riot may result as more and more joined in on the call for His death. Finally, he gave the answer they were seeking and pronounced the death penalty. The final blow came with the release of Barabbas. Luke wrote that Jesus was “delivered Jesus to their will.” In other words the evil plan of the Jews was endorsed by Pilate because of fear for his own political future. From that point on nothing more is heard of the man. He had served his purpose. Unwillingly he had fulfilled prophecy as was Judas.
-
Why is it that people give into the demands of those who are loud?
-
Why did Pilate allow himself to be intimidated by those individuals? (Their outcries may have
4
been a prelude to riots that would have ended Pilate’s career.)
3. What was evidence that the crowd had prevailed? (Barabbas was released.)
4. Why did the word of God no longer mention Pilate? (He had served his purpose.)
5. What was his final act? (He turned Jesus over to His accusers.)
-
Always be careful to never take part in gossip that can destroy the life or reputation of others.
-
Always be prepared to testify for Jesus in the face of strong opposition.
-
Look to Jesus as an example when you are accused of things that are not true.
-
Watch out for those who declare themselves religious but then act like the world.
-
Learn to love Christ more than you love your own life.
There is a series of fantastic books written a number of years ago by Lee Strobel. Each began with the title “A Case for.” He then went on to build a case for Christ, the Creator, Christmas, Faith and Easter and more. This is to be our purpose in the kingdom of God. If we spend our time promoting The Father, Son and Holy Spirit there will be little time to be involved in the controversies that infiltrate the Church. To know Christ in that way will keep us focused on what is important in our lives and gossip and starting rumors certainly are not part of what we are to be. In our lesson today we have seen how one little group of men through sheer determination was able to change the mind of a tough Roman governor which led to the condemnation of Jesus. Let us not forget how powerful words are. They can either be used for good or to bring about evil. Let it not be said about us that our words brought division in the church or to reflect badly on the name of Jesus.