Lesson 56
Real Authority
Luke 20:1-20
Most of us probably have a love hate relationship with the idea of authority. Everyone of us live under some type of it whether it is the government or the place we work. I guess because of my nature where I question so many things I have had my run in with those over me. This has been especially true when they have exhibited a lack of true leadership skills. I have a great respect for those I consider great leaders. If I could back in history it would have been interesting to work for George Washington for instance. His character qualities are something that I should strive to emulate. That is one of the primary reasons that I read biographies of those who lived at the beginning of the founding of this country.
There is another type of authority that comes into play. It has to do more with the truthfulness of the words that one says or writes. The best in man still reflects the truths of those who have gone before them. There are certain writers that I admire and read because I believe they are men of integrity and have thoroughly researched what they are presenting. They have lived out the words that they put on paper in their own lives. One point needs to be made even of the most prolific writer or speaker. Everything they present has been learned because of the knowledge or wisdom imparted to them by those who came before them. When I think of my own writing I know that there is probably not an original idea in my head that someone else along the way has not previously expressed. I am thankful to be able draw on their experiences and learning to develop my thoughts. The fact a person has been willing to dedicate his or her life to master a particular field of study humbles me. The work they have done allows me to benefit from their accumulated knowledge.
Many of you have heard me say that author so and so said or in a book I just read the author presented a particular defense of his own point of view. To keep learning I read those authorities that stretch my thinking who make me a stronger person. There has been only one person who did not have to depend on what others thought to teach the truth.
The church is certainly not exempt from the kind of abuse of power that we see in the Pharisees and Sadducees. For centuries the catholic church held its people in complete domination as one corrupt Pope after another used his power for personal gain. In recent years both the Catholic church and protestant churches have seen the moral failings of those in positions of authority. Man is fallible and needs to truly put himself under the authority and leadership of Jesus Christ. Any other path is a prescription for failure. George Barna did a survey a number of years ago that discovered that well under 50 percent of pastors believed the had the gift of leadership. Yet we put these men into that very position because they have been trained in some Bible Institution. We expect them to succeed in a position for which they may be ill equipped to handle. Today we will begin to see how men who had received the best training still did not know the truth they were suppose to be teaching.
Luke 20:1-2
It is interesting that the lawyers (Scribes), the Sadducees and other religious leaders did not see the procession into Jerusalem as grounds to get rid of Jesus. They needed evidence that would incriminate Him as a law breaker which would allow them to destroy Him. Their next tactic was to get Him to blaspheme the name of God by claiming to be His Son. To accomplish this they sent to Him a contingent of religious leaders
1
to trap with His own words. They asked Him who gave Him authority to march into Jerusalem, overturn the money tables and teach the things He continued to teach. Their question came from their point of reference. They had been trained in the best of the Rabbinic tradition and He would have had a minimal education at best. His very teaching confounded them because like most today they could only quote what someone who was an authority had to say on the subject being discussed. Jesus did not need to depend on others because He was speaking under the authority of God.
-
Why did the religious leaders not see the ride into Jerusalem as grounds to bring charges against Jesus? (The journey was a picture of the Messiah coming but Jesus did not verbally make that claim.)
-
Why did the Pharisees in particular raise the question of Jesus’ qualifications? (They would not dare to teach other than what had been taught by the ancient Rabbi’s who they saw as authorities.)
-
What was different about the teaching of Jesus?
-
What are we to do to be well grounded in any subject? (Study as much as possible of what is written by those who are genuinely knowledgeable into a particular subject.)
-
What are the subjects that interest you the most?
-
Who do you consider authorities in that particular area? Why?
Luke 20:3-4
Knowing the motive behind the question Jesus did not answer their question. To have done so would have set up a confrontation that would have ended His life before the time set by the Father. As He had said many times before His hour had not yet come. Instead of answering them He posed a question to them which would determine His response. He asked them to explain where John the Baptist had gotten his authority since he also had not attended the Rabbinic schools. He wanted to know whether the baptism that he had performed was it divinely ordained or did John do it on his own.
-
Why did Jesus not answer their question directly?
-
What was the motive behind it?
-
Why did Jesus ask them about the ministry of John?
-
In what ways were Jesus and John the Baptist alike? (Their work was ordained by God and not man. Neither had the proper credentials to do what they were doing. In the eyes of the religious leaders they were disqualified because of their lack of education.)
-
Why did Jesus speak specifically of the baptisms performed by John? (That was his primary ministry to call people to repentance and point them to Jesus.)
-
What does Jesus method of dealing with those men tell us about the way we should respond when asked about our faith? (Sometimes we need to discern what the inquirer means by his or her question.)
Luke 20:5-7
The question presented a dilemma for the men. There was only one correct answer of course but they had to confer with each other about their decision. In their minds neither of the answers would have gotten them off the hook with the people or God. The two choices were:
-
It was from heaven. To say that would beg the question why then had they rejected John’s call to repentance?
2
-
It was from man. Because the people believed that John had been sent by God they would stoned the religious leaders for misrepresenting him.
In order to protect themselves they pleaded ignorance. In other words they had no opinion one way or the other. It would be equivalent today of “taking the fifth amendment” to hide one’s guilt.
-
What quandary did this present for the religious leaders?
-
Why could they not bring themselves to answer the question truthfully?
-
What may have been some situations in which you have found yourselves in the same dilemma?
-
Why did the men answer as they did? (They were afraid of the people either way.)
-
When have you answered as they did?
-
How did you feel afterwards?
-
Did you do anything to correct your error? What? (Probably by asking these last three questions may have caused some of us to remember a time we would prefer to forget.)
Luke 20:8
Because they would not answer the simple question, Jesus felt no obligation to fall into the trap they had set for Him. Surely if they did not recognize John for who he was, they would not have accepted any explanation that Jesus might present to reveal Himself. He had already done enough in the three years of His ministry to convince anyone of His identity if had just chosen to be open to receive the gospel. They did not know John and as Jesus had told them before they did not know Him or His Father. See John 5:33-47
-
Why did Jesus feel no obligation to answer them?
-
What should have been the evidence that Jesus was who He said He was? (See John 5:33)
-
How did the religious leaders miss it?
-
Before you became a follower of Christ how did you ignore the evidence that was available to you?
-
What does it take to receive Christ and His good news?
Luke 20:9-15a
Immediately in Luke’s gospel Jesus launches into a parable which clearly pointed out the history of the Jewish people, especially the religious leaders of that day. God is represented in the man who planted a vineyard which symbolizes Israel. The vine-growers who were given the privilege of leading of His chosen people in the world. That list would have included men like Samuel, Saul, David, Solomon and the kings of Israel. Some of those men were righteous while others worship idols and led the people astray. The long period of time would encompass the time from Israel becoming His people until the time of Christ. Since God was the owner of the vineyard He rightfully would have expected His people to love and honor Him. Rather than producing the fruit of that relationship they turned their backs on Him in complete disobedience.
God sent His prophets to bring the people back to Him. They would not listen to the words from God and mistreated and killed the messengers from God. Finally, He had one more person to send. If anyone was to be respected and accepted as the messenger of God it surely would be the son. The vine-growers however decided to kill him thinking that by eliminating him the vineyard would be theirs to keep. The son in this parable was Jesus who the religious leaders and many in land rejected.
3
The men did exactly as they had planned. They threw him out of the vineyard and killed him. This is the picture of the crucifixion. Jesus was crucified outside of the city.
-
In what ways is this parable a picture of the breath of Jewish history?
-
Who were the different characters in the narrative?
-
If the parable was written today how do you think it would be written?
-
Why did the vine-growers want the vineyard to themselves?
-
Who are some of the vine-growers today?
-
In what ways are they still trying to crucify Jesus?
-
What can anyone do about it?
Luke 20:15b-16a
Jesus then asked a direct question to all who were standing there. He wanted to know what God would do with the religious leaders and the nation of Israel because of their deeds. The question was a rhetorical one. Obviously, there was but one choice the people would face the wrath of God. They would be destroyed and the vineyard itself would come under the rule of others. He also pointed to the new vineyard the church when speaking of it being given to others.
-
What does the question Jesus asked say about God’s response to a people who totally reject Him?
-
Why could He rightfully carry out the judgment? (They were judging themselves as we have seen by their history.)
-
What can we in the United States expect if we continue down the path we are traveling?
-
What can turn it around?
-
In what ways do you think it might be too late? (Snowballs do not generally get smaller when going downhill. We are fulfilling prophecy found in the New Testament especially as written in 2 Timothy and 2 Peter.)
Luke 20:16b
How could Jesus make such a statement. Surely God would not do anything to His chosen people. After all had He not spoken the covenant back in the days of Abraham and Moses. Once again Jesus turned to the word of God to answer them. He took the words from Psalm 118:22 and applied it to the Sanhedrin and Himself. He was the cornerstone which they had rejected. Without a perfect cornerstone the whole building would be out of line. The religious leaders did not believe that they needed anyone to tell them what to do. They therefore were casting aside the very One who could give them life. The first thing they had done was to trip over Him. He could not be avoided and kept getting in their way. Jesus then spoke of their final judgment and destruction. It was about forty years from that time that the city of Jerusalem was completely destroyed and the religious life of the Jews was forever changed.
-
Why did the Jews believe that nothing was going to happen to them?
-
In what ways do we have that same attitude today?
-
Why did Jesus use Psalm 118 to describe the situation? (It would point the importance of that stone by which everything was measured but was considered unfit according to the standards of the people.)
-
What was the clear picture to He painted for the people? (Judgment was to come.)
4
Luke 20:19-20
The parable angered the religious leaders because they had understood that it had been about them. They wanted to arrest Him at that time but they were afraid of the people as they had been in their response to John’s authority. Their primary tactic was to send some of their associates to spy on Him. They were to try and catch him saying something that could use against Him. They had given up on seeking to trap Him in breaking some point of the law of the Jews. At that point they were attempting to formulate a case against Him that would get Him in trouble with the Roman government.
-
Why did the religious leaders want to arrest Jesus? (They understood that it was a clear representation of them put out where all the world could observe.)
-
Why were they afraid of the people? (Above all else they were self-preservationists. They were not about to do anything that would put themselves in a bad light and cause themselves injury.)
-
Why did they send others to attempt to trap Jesus? (Jesus knew them and their methods.)
-
Why had they given up on executed Him themselves? (They could find no fault with Him in regards to the Law of Moses?
-
Why were they so determined to get rid of Jesus? (He had called into question their authority and destroyed their credibility was the teachers of truth.)
-
Remember there are two types of authority The one has to do with ruling over another. We may not have any choice because it happens in all organizations. The second has to do with someone who has great knowledge of a particular subject. This is the area where we are to take great care in choosing whom we decide to believe.
-
Look at the testimonies of those who know an individual before deciding to follow them.
-
Spend considerable time searching the Bible to determine if the teaching you hear is is correct.
-
Use your mind in searching for the truth before committing yourself to Christ. Salvation is simple but not easy.
-
Do not be deceived by those who declare themselves as experts. Remember that the old characterization of one is a drip under pressure. His assertions need to be tested to validate them.
As an example of the way a church should view authority can be found in the process that was used by our church to select the Elders that now compose the Elder Team. The church began by rewriting the by-laws to set in motion the change that allowed for a Elder led church. A number of sessions were held laying out the qualifications of the men who would be selected for that position. The church leaned heavily on the teaching of Paul in both 2 Timothy 3 and Titus plus Acts 6. The church then presented names to the deacons and the Pastor Search Committee. Each man was asked to fill out a detailed questionaire and was then interviewed by the above mentioned two groups. After the interviews five men were presented to the church for approval. The six elder was added when the Teaching Elder was called to the church.
I went through this process to show the diligence of the church to make sure that the men selected were in their minds were qualified to have authority to lead the church. Since that time the church still has the power to hold these men accountable. As important is the standard to which the men hold themselves and each other. We need to be ever diligent to make sure that our leaders always hold to the standards set by Christ.
6